Rajeswary vs Mohanan Advocate - BIJU. D — 100098/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Listed to. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLAL250001432022
Filing Number
100139/2022
Filing Date
11-Mar-2022
Registration No
100098/2022
Registration Date
11-Mar-2022
Court
Munsiffs Court, Kayamkulam
Judge
1-Munsiff
Last updated 25-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rajeswary
Adv. SREEPRIYA. A
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mohanan Advocate - BIJU. D
-
2.Jagdamma
Adv. BIJU. D
Case History
-
20-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
26-Mar-2026
Listed to
Munsiff
-
12-Mar-2026
Return of notice
Munsiff
-
25-Feb-2026
Return of summons
Munsiff
-
09-Feb-2026
for evidence.
Munsiff
-
03-Feb-2026
For reports
Munsiff
-
28-Jan-2026
For reports
Munsiff
-
15-Jan-2026
For evidence
Munsiff
-
05-Jan-2026
Order/Judgement
Munsiff
-
19-Dec-2025
Objection
Munsiff
-
10-Dec-2025
Objection
Munsiff
-
26-Nov-2025
Call on
Munsiff
-
13-Nov-2025
For Defendent Evidence
Munsiff
-
22-Oct-2025
Call on
Munsiff
-
30-Sep-2025
Adjourned
Munsiff
-
18-Sep-2025
For Defendent Evidence
Munsiff
-
25-Aug-2025
For evidence
Munsiff
-
14-Aug-2025
For evidence
Munsiff
-
01-Aug-2025
For cross examination.
Munsiff
-
17-Jul-2025
For Examination of Witness
Munsiff
-
08-Jul-2025
Return of summons
Munsiff
-
19-May-2025
Objection
Munsiff
-
09-Apr-2025
Objection
Munsiff
-
04-Apr-2025
Further evidence
Munsiff
-
01-Apr-2025
For evidence
Munsiff
-
06-Jan-2025
Listed to
Munsiff
-
11-Dec-2024
Pre trial steps
Munsiff
-
15-Nov-2024
Pre trial steps
Munsiff
-
14-Oct-2024
Objection
Munsiff
-
22-Aug-2024
Issues
Munsiff
-
19-Jul-2024
Issues
Munsiff
-
23-May-2024
Issues
Munsiff
-
25-Mar-2024
Report on mediation
Munsiff
-
22-Feb-2024
Report on mediation
Munsiff
-
06-Dec-2023
Issues
Munsiff
-
18-Sep-2023
Issues
Munsiff
-
20-Feb-2023
Issues
Munsiff
-
05-Dec-2022
OrderView PDF
-
05-Dec-2022
OrderView PDF
Summary The petition for temporary injunction was dismissed by the Munsiff Court, Kayamkulam on December 5, 2022. The court found that the petitioner (property owner Rajeswary) failed to establish a prima facie case and that the balance of convenience did not favor granting an injunction against the respondents' possession of the disputed property. The court reasoned that without demarcating the exact extent of the disputed area between the parties' competing claims (petitioner claims 2 cents, respondents claim 10 cents), any injunction order would unfairly prejudice the respondents' possessory rights, which have been exercised since 1966. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Dec-2022
Issues
Munsiff
-
24-Nov-2022
Call with IA
Munsiff
-
19-Nov-2022
Call with IA
Munsiff
-
17-Nov-2022
Call with IA
Munsiff
-
14-Nov-2022
Call with IA
Munsiff
-
09-Nov-2022
Call on
Munsiff
-
03-Nov-2022
Call on
Munsiff
-
29-Aug-2022
No sitting notified
Munsiff
-
12-Aug-2022
For evidence
Munsiff
-
20-May-2022
Written Statement
Munsiff
-
11-Mar-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 100098/2022
Summary The petition for temporary injunction was dismissed by the Munsiff Court, Kayamkulam on December 5, 2022. The court found that the petitioner (property owner Rajeswary) failed to establish a prima facie case and that the balance of convenience did not favor granting an injunction against the respondents' possession of the disputed property. The court reasoned that without demarcating the exact extent of the disputed area between the parties' competing claims (petitioner claims 2 cents, respondents claim 10 cents), any injunction order would unfairly prejudice the respondents' possessory rights, which have been exercised since 1966. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts