Abdul Hameed vs Hanson — 100089/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED WITH COST on 24th March 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLAL250001322023
Filing Number
132/2023
Filing Date
04-03-2023
Registration No
100089/2023
Registration Date
04-03-2023
Court
Munsiffs Court, Kayamkulam
Judge
1-Munsiff
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED WITH COST
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Abdul Hameed
Adv. Ajith. G
Respondent(s)
Hanson
Shobitha
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff
Disposed
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
exparte evidence
exparte evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 02-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 28-02-2026 | exparte evidence |
| 12-02-2026 | exparte evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Munsiff Court in Kayamkulam granted a permanent prohibitory injunction in favor of plaintiff Abdul Hameed, restraining his son (1st defendant) and daughter-in-law (2nd defendant) from trespassing into, taking possession of, or forcibly residing in his newly constructed property. The court found the plaintiff's unchallenged evidence—including the sale deed and tax receipts proving ownership—sufficient to decree the suit, and ordered the defendants to pay litigation costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Munsiff Court in Kayamkulam granted a permanent prohibitory injunction in favor of plaintiff Abdul Hameed, restraining his son (1st defendant) and daughter-in-law (2nd defendant) from trespassing into, taking possession of, or forcibly residing in his newly constructed property. The court found the plaintiff's unchallenged evidence—including the sale deed and tax receipts proving ownership—sufficient to decree the suit, and ordered the defendants to pay litigation costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts