Biju vs Vattakkadu Youth League Vayanasala Advocate - Sreekumar.N.S, Sreekumar.N.S — 100067/2021

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Listed to. Next hearing: 04th August 2026.

Listed to Next hearing 04-Aug-2026 this date has passed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLAL250001042021

Filing Number

100102/2021

Filing Date

25-Feb-2021

Registration No

100067/2021

Registration Date

25-Feb-2021

Court

Munsiffs Court, Kayamkulam

Judge

1-Munsiff

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Biju

    Adv. SUNNYKUTTY. K

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vattakkadu Youth League Vayanasala Advocate - Sreekumar.N.S, Sreekumar.N.S

  2. 2.G.Sasidharan Pillai

    Adv. Sreekumar N S,ANZARI C M

  3. 3.S.S.Abhilash Kumar

    Adv. Sreekumar N S,ANZARI C M

Case History

  1. 04-Aug-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 31-Mar-2026

    Listed to

    Munsiff

  3. 21-Mar-2026

    Call on

    Munsiff

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    For Examination of Witness

    Munsiff

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Return of summons

    Munsiff

  6. 09-Feb-2026

    For return of summons

    Munsiff

  7. 12-Jan-2026

    Call on

    Munsiff

  8. 29-Nov-2025

    Call on

    Munsiff

  9. 18-Nov-2025

    Return of summons

    Munsiff

  10. 07-Nov-2025

    Return of summons

    Munsiff

  11. 06-Aug-2025

    Listed to

    Munsiff

  12. 11-Jun-2025

    Listed to

    Munsiff

  13. 07-Jun-2025

    Listed to

    Munsiff

  14. 06-Feb-2025

    Listed to

    Munsiff

  15. 14-Jan-2025

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff

  16. 18-Dec-2024

    Issues

    Munsiff

  17. 30-Nov-2024

    Issues

    Munsiff

  18. 06-Nov-2024

    Issues

    Munsiff

  19. 09-Oct-2024

    Issues

    Munsiff

  20. 10-Sep-2024

    Written Statement

    Munsiff

  21. 31-Aug-2024

    Written Statement

    Munsiff

  22. 05-Aug-2024

    Written Statement

    Munsiff

  23. 06-Jul-2024

    Written Statement

    Munsiff

  24. 12-Apr-2024

    Objection

    Munsiff

  25. 11-Mar-2024

    Objection

    Munsiff

  26. 24-Jan-2024

    Objection

    Munsiff

  27. 20-Jan-2024

    Objection

    Munsiff

  28. 03-Jan-2024

    Objection

    Munsiff

  29. 15-Nov-2023

    Objection

    Munsiff

  30. 14-Sep-2023

    Objection

    Munsiff

  31. 23-Aug-2023

    No sitting notified

    Munsiff

  32. 17-Aug-2023

    No sitting notified

    Munsiff

  33. 26-Jun-2023

    exparte evidence

    Munsiff

  34. 03-Apr-2023

    Written Statement

    Munsiff

  35. 26-Nov-2022

    Written Statement

    Munsiff

  36. 13-Jul-2022

    Written Statement

    Munsiff

  37. 28-Mar-2022

    Written Statement

    Munsiff

  38. 14-Jan-2022

    Written Statement

    Munsiff

  39. 24-Sep-2021

    Written Statement

    Munsiff

  40. 26-Jul-2021

    Written Statement

    Munsiff

  41. 09-Apr-2021

    OrderView PDF

    Court Order Summary Petition Allowed - Injunction Made Absolute The Munsiff Court of Kayamkulam allowed the petition filed under Order XXXIX Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code and made the ad-interim injunction absolute, permanently restraining the respondents (Vattakkadu Youth League and its officers) from obstructing the petitioner's use of a pathway for ingress and egress to his property. The court found that the pathway was the only access route to the petitioner's property and that a commissioner's inspection confirmed no alternate pathway existed, despite the respondents' claims to the contrary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  42. 09-Apr-2021

    Written Statement

    Munsiff

  43. 31-Mar-2021

    Written Statement

    Munsiff

  44. 30-Mar-2021

    Call on

    Munsiff

  45. 25-Mar-2021

    No sitting notified

    Munsiff

  46. 25-Feb-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  47. 25-Feb-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100067/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Petition Allowed - Injunction Made Absolute The Munsiff Court of Kayamkulam allowed the petition filed under Order XXXIX Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code and made the ad-interim injunction absolute, permanently restraining the respondents (Vattakkadu Youth League and its officers) from obstructing the petitioner's use of a pathway for ingress and egress to his property. The court found that the pathway was the only access route to the petitioner's property and that a commissioner's inspection confirmed no alternate pathway existed, despite the respondents' claims to the contrary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case