Reshmi S vs Saji S — 164/2025

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12. Status: Appearance Of Parties. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.

Appearance Of Parties Next hearing 06-Jul-2026 this date has passed

MC - MISCELLANEOUS CASE

CNR: KLAL240021882025

Filing Number

1707/2025

Filing Date

11-Nov-2025

Registration No

164/2025

Registration Date

11-Nov-2025

Court

JFCM II, Haripad

Judge

1-Judicial First Class Magistrate - II, Haripad

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Reshmi S

    Adv. HEMA R

  2. 2.Sreenith

    Adv. HEMA R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Saji S

  2. 2.Lathika

  3. 3.Sathyaseelan

  4. 4.Sajitha

Case History

  1. 06-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 28-Apr-2026

    Appearance Of Parties

    Judicial First Class Magistrate - II, Haripad

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Issue notice

    Judicial First Class Magistrate - II, Haripad

  4. 27-Dec-2025

    Appearance Of Parties

    Judicial First Class Magistrate - II, Haripad

  5. 11-Nov-2025

    Interim OrderView PDF

    Summary: The court granted an ex parte interim order under Section 23 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The respondents are restrained from committing any acts of physical, verbal, or emotional violence against the petitioner (Reshmi S.) and her 4-month-old child, and from interfering with their peaceful residence. The order was issued after the court found a prima facie likelihood of domestic violence and deemed court intervention necessary for protection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 11-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 11-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 164/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court granted an ex parte interim order under Section 23 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The respondents are restrained from committing any acts of physical, verbal, or emotional violence against the petitioner (Reshmi S.) and her 4-month-old child, and from interfering with their peaceful residence. The order was issued after the court found a prima facie likelihood of domestic violence and deemed court intervention necessary for protection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case