State of Kerala (Police) vs Varun.C Advocate - Krishnakumar. V — 100226/2022
Case under Ipc \ Section 406,408,420,34. Status: Adjourned. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLAL240008212022
Next Hearing
20th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
100818/2022
Filing Date
03-10-2022
Registration No
100226/2022
Registration Date
03-10-2022
Court
JFCM II, Haripad
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate - II, Haripad
FIR Details
FIR Number
552
Police Station
Haripad Police Station
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala (Police)
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Varun.C Advocate - Krishnakumar. V
Dileepkumar@Dileep
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate - II, Haripad
Adjourned
For hearing in CMP
For objecting and hearing CMP
FOR HEARING
Call on
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | Adjourned | |
| 06-04-2026 | For hearing in CMP | |
| 24-03-2026 | For objecting and hearing CMP | |
| 18-03-2026 | FOR HEARING | |
| 17-03-2026 | Call on |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition filed by Sri. Sreekumar Keecheril, President of Manakkadu Devi Temple Devaswom Committee, seeking permission to compound a criminal case on behalf of the temple was allowed by the Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Haripad on 16th February 2026. The court found the petitioner competent to compound the case as the custodian of the temple's gold ornaments and valuables under the temple's bye-law, and noted that the governing body had authorized him to take necessary steps for settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition filed by Sri. Sreekumar Keecheril, President of Manakkadu Devi Temple Devaswom Committee, seeking permission to compound a criminal case on behalf of the temple was allowed by the Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Haripad on 16th February 2026. The court found the petitioner competent to compound the case as the custodian of the temple's gold ornaments and valuables under the temple's bye-law, and noted that the governing body had authorized him to take necessary steps for settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts