State of Kerala (Police), Kareelakkulangara vs Subair @ Pakki Subair — 200980/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 457, 461, 380. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED U/S 271 BNSS on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CALENDAR CASE

CNR: KLAL230026502024

Filing Number

202649/2024

Filing Date

17-Oct-2024

Registration No

200980/2024

Registration Date

17-Oct-2024

Court

JFCM I, Haripad

Judge

1-Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED U/S 271 BNSS

Last updated 25-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

469

Police Station

Kareelakulangara Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 457, 461, 380

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Kerala (Police), Kareelakkulangara

    Adv. The APP, Haripad

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Subair @ Pakki Subair

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Summary The Haripad First Class Magistrate Court acquitted accused Subair of charges under IPC sections 457, 380, and 461 (house-breaking, theft, and burglary). The court found the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, citing critical evidentiary gaps: no recovery of stolen articles from the accused, absence of linking evidence, reliance on inadmissible police custody confessions under Section 23 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, and witnesses lacking direct knowledge of the alleged June 2024 theft. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Issue bailable warrant to witness

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Issue bailable warrant to witness

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad

  8. 05-Mar-2026

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad

  9. 19-Feb-2026

    Repeat Summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad

  10. 11-Feb-2026

    Repeat Summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad

  11. 05-Feb-2026

    Repeat Summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad

  12. 14-Jan-2026

    Repeat Summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad

  13. 01-Jan-2026

    Repeat Summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad

  14. 12-Dec-2025

    Issue Summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad

  15. 12-Nov-2025

    No sitting notified

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad

  16. 06-Oct-2025

    Issue Summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad

  17. 22-Aug-2025

    Issue production warrant

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad

  18. 18-Jul-2025

    No sitting notified

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad

  19. 16-May-2025

    Appearance of Accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad

  20. 13-Mar-2025

    Appearance of Accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad

  21. 05-Feb-2025

    Appearance of Accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad

  22. 04-Jan-2025

    Appearance of Accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad

  23. 11-Nov-2024

    Appearance of Accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad

  24. 04-Nov-2024

    Appearance of Accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad

  25. 29-Oct-2024

    Appearance of Accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad

  26. 17-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 17-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 200980/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Haripad First Class Magistrate Court acquitted accused Subair of charges under IPC sections 457, 380, and 461 (house-breaking, theft, and burglary). The court found the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, citing critical evidentiary gaps: no recovery of stolen articles from the accused, absence of linking evidence, reliance on inadmissible police custody confessions under Section 23 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, and witnesses lacking direct knowledge of the alleged June 2024 theft. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case