State of Kerala (Police), Haripad vs Muhammed Kunju — 200611/2023
Case under Penal Code, 1860 Section 447,427. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED U/S 255 BNSS on 31st March 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLAL230016322023
e-Filing Number
30-06-2023
Filing Number
201631/2023
Filing Date
06-Jul-2023
Registration No
200611/2023
Registration Date
06-Jul-2023
Court
JFCM I, Haripad
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad
Decision Date
31-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED U/S 255 BNSS
Last updated 12-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
226
Police Station
Haripad Police Station
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Kerala (Police), Haripad
Respondent(s)
-
1.Muhammed Kunju
-
2.Abdul Muneer
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
31-Mar-2026
Judgement
Summary The Judicial First Class Magistrate, Haripad acquitted Muhammad Kunju of charges under IPC Sections 447 (criminal trespass) and 427 (mischief causing loss) on March 31, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the accused's presence at the occurrence or his intent to trespass/intimidate, noting the key-prosecution eyewitness turned hostile and no corroborating evidence substantiated the alleged acts. The case stemmed from a property dispute between relatives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
31-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad
-
30-Mar-2026
For Hearing
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad
-
28-Mar-2026
Defence Evidence
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad
-
27-Mar-2026
Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad
-
17-Mar-2026
Repeat Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad
-
11-Mar-2026
Issue Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad
-
02-Mar-2026
Issue bailable warrant to witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad
-
13-Feb-2026
for evidence.
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad
-
22-Jan-2026
Issue bailable warrant to witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad
-
13-Jan-2026
Issue bailable warrant to witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad
-
01-Jan-2026
Issue bailable warrant to witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad
-
22-Dec-2025
Issue bailable warrant to witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad
-
05-Dec-2025
Issue bailable warrant to witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad
-
26-Nov-2025
Issue bailable warrant to witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad
-
13-Nov-2025
Repeat Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad
-
21-Oct-2025
Repeat Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad
-
07-Oct-2025
Issue Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad
-
21-Aug-2025
Issue bailable warrant to witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad
-
18-Jul-2025
No sitting notified
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad
-
01-Jul-2025
Issue Bailable Warrant
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad
-
19-May-2025
for evidence.
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad
-
09-Apr-2025
for evidence.
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad
-
11-Feb-2025
for evidence.
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad
-
11-Dec-2024
for evidence.
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad
-
21-Aug-2024
Repeat Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad
-
13-Jun-2024
Hearing scheduled
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad
-
12-Apr-2024
Hearing scheduled
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad
-
12-Dec-2023
Hearing scheduled
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Haripad
-
12-Sep-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Jul-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 200611/2023
Summary The Judicial First Class Magistrate, Haripad acquitted Muhammad Kunju of charges under IPC Sections 447 (criminal trespass) and 427 (mischief causing loss) on March 31, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the accused's presence at the occurrence or his intent to trespass/intimidate, noting the key-prosecution eyewitness turned hostile and no corroborating evidence substantiated the alleged acts. The case stemmed from a property dispute between relatives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts