Pappachan vs Brahmanandan Advocate - ANILKUMAR. G — 100408/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section S26,OVII,R1. Status: FOR HEARING. Next hearing: 29th May 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLAL220005742015
Next Hearing
29th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
100570/2015
Filing Date
23-12-2015
Registration No
100408/2015
Registration Date
23-12-2015
Court
Munsiff Court, Haripad
Judge
1-Munsiff, Haripad
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pappachan
Adv. IBRAHIMKUTTY. M
Preethy
Adv. M Ibrahimkutty
Respondent(s)
Brahmanandan Advocate - ANILKUMAR. G
Dushyanda
Adv. ANILKUMAR. G
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff, Haripad
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | FOR HEARING | |
| 18-03-2026 | FOR HEARING | |
| 09-03-2026 | FOR HEARING | |
| 26-02-2026 | FOR HEARING | |
| 18-02-2026 | FOR HEARING |
Interim Orders
Summary The suit for permanent prohibitory injunction filed by Pappachan and Preethi against Bhramanandan and Dhushyantha was decreed with costs. The Munsiff's Court granted a permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants from trespassing into the plaintiffs' property, using it as a way, committing waste, or obstructing the completion of the compound wall on the southern and eastern boundaries. The defendants were set exparte for non-appearance during trial, and the court found the plaintiffs' case established based on uncontroverted testimony and documentary evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The suit for permanent prohibitory injunction filed by Pappachan and Preethi against Bhramanandan and Dhushyantha was decreed with costs. The Munsiff's Court granted a permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants from trespassing into the plaintiffs' property, using it as a way, committing waste, or obstructing the completion of the compound wall on the southern and eastern boundaries. The defendants were set exparte for non-appearance during trial, and the court found the plaintiffs' case established based on uncontroverted testimony and documentary evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts