Yaminikutty@Yamini Devi vs Krishnan Namboothiri Advocate - LATHA B — 387/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26, Orde 7, Clause 1 and 2. Status: Verify and report. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLAL220005172025

Verify and report

Next Hearing

18th June 2026

Filing Number

532/2025

Filing Date

05-11-2025

Registration No

387/2025

Registration Date

10-11-2025

Court

Munsiff Court, Haripad

Judge

1-Munsiff, Haripad

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26, Orde 7, Clause 1 and 2
Ia/1/2025 Classification : Injunction Application Section Yaminikutty@Yamini DeviKrishnan Namboothiri
Ia/2/2025 Classification : Commission Application Section Yaminikutty@Yamini DeviKrishnan Namboothiri
Ia/3/2025 Classification : Petition to Accept Photocopy Section Yaminikutty@Yamini DeviKrishnan Namboothiri
Ia/4/2025 Classification : Application for Admission of Documents Section Yaminikutty@Yamini DeviKrishnan Namboothiri
Ia/1/2026 Classification : Advance Application Section Krishnan NamboothiriYaminikutty@Yamini Devi
Ia/2/2026 Classification : Petition Section Yaminikutty@Yamini DeviKrishnan Namboothiri
Ia/3/2026 Classification : Advance Application Section Krishnan NamboothiriYaminikutty@Yamini Devi
Ia/4/2026 Classification : Urgent Application Section Yaminikutty@Yamini DeviKrishnan Namboothiri

Petitioner(s)

Yaminikutty@Yamini Devi

Adv. VIJAYAMBIKA. D

Yamuna Devi

Adv. VIJAYAMBIKA. D

Respondent(s)

Krishnan Namboothiri Advocate - LATHA B

Mahesh

Adv. LATHA B

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Munsiff, Haripad

23-03-2026

Verify and report

18-03-2026

Orders in IA

11-03-2026

Orders in IA

28-02-2026

For further hearing

24-02-2026

For hearing on IA

Interim Orders

23-03-2026
Order
23-03-2026
Order
23-03-2026
Order
23-03-2026
Order

Summary: The petition filed by Krishnan Namboothiri (the father of the plaintiffs) to implead himself as an additional third plaintiff in the property dispute suit was dismissed. The court held that the petitioner's presence was not necessary for effective adjudication of the suit between the plaintiffs and defendants, and that he could pursue his grievances regarding the disputed sale deed separately through independent legal proceedings. Both parties are directed to bear their respective costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition filed by Krishnan Namboothiri (the father of the plaintiffs) to implead himself as an additional third plaintiff in the property dispute suit was dismissed. The court held that the petitioner's presence was not necessary for effective adjudication of the suit between the plaintiffs and defendants, and that he could pursue his grievances regarding the disputed sale deed separately through independent legal proceedings. Both parties are directed to bear their respective costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Munsiff Court, Haripad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case