Sree Kolathu Devi Temple administered by Thevalappurathu Kudumbayogam, rep. by its President vs Sasikumar Advocate - BENO. G — 100345/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section S.26, Order 7, Rule 1, 2. Status: For hearing on IA. Next hearing: 21st May 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLAL220004362023

For hearing on IA

Next Hearing

21st May 2026

e-Filing Number

09-10-2023

Filing Number

100522/2023

Filing Date

09-10-2023

Registration No

100345/2023

Registration Date

09-10-2023

Court

Munsiff Court, Haripad

Judge

1-Munsiff, Haripad

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code Section S.26, Order 7, Rule 1, 2
IA/1/2026 Classification : Petition Section Sree Kolathu Devi Temple administered by Thevalappurathu Kudumbayogam, rep. by its President
IA/2/2026 Classification : Advance Application Section SasikumarSree Kolathu Devi Temple administered by Thevalappurathu Kudumbayogam, rep. by its President
IA/3/2026 Classification : Application For Permission To Appoint Lawyer Section SasikumarSree Kolathu Devi Temple administered by Thevalappurathu Kudumbayogam, rep. by its President
IA/4/2026 Classification : Petition Section SasikumarKunjaniyan

Petitioner(s)

Sree Kolathu Devi Temple administered by Thevalappurathu Kudumbayogam, rep. by its President

Adv. BIJU. D

Respondent(s)

Sasikumar Advocate - BENO. G

Secretary, Thevalappurathu Kudumbayogam Administrative Committee,rep. by Mohandas

Adv. BENO. G

Santhosh

Adv. BENO. G,AYYAPPAN S

Vipindas

Adv. BENO. G,AYYAPPAN S

Sajeevan

Adv. BENO. G,AYYAPPAN S

Pramod

Adv. BENO. G,AYYAPPAN S

Prasanthi Haridasan

Adv. BENO. G,AYYAPPAN S

Ponnamma

Adv. BENO. G,AYYAPPAN S

Ullas Kumar

Adv. BENO. G,AYYAPPAN S

E B Venugopal

Adv. BENO. G

Beby Sarojam

Adv. BENO. G,AYYAPPAN S

Kunjaniyan

Adv. BENO. G

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Munsiff, Haripad

27-03-2026

For hearing on IA

09-03-2026

For hearing on IA

26-02-2026

For hearing on IA

25-02-2026

For commission report

20-02-2026

For commission report

Interim Orders

07-03-2025
Order
07-03-2025
Order

Summary The Munsiff Court at Haripad dismissed a petition filed by 12 defendants seeking to implead two banks (Alappuzha District Co-operative Bank and Punjab National Bank) as additional parties to a suit concerning temple administration disputes. The court held that the banks are not necessary or proper parties for effective adjudication, as the dispute is solely between the plaintiff and defendants. Both parties were directed to bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Munsiff Court at Haripad dismissed a petition filed by 12 defendants seeking to implead two banks (Alappuzha District Co-operative Bank and Punjab National Bank) as additional parties to a suit concerning temple administration disputes. The court held that the banks are not necessary or proper parties for effective adjudication, as the dispute is solely between the plaintiff and defendants. Both parties were directed to bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Munsiff Court, Haripad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case