Sree Kolathu Devi Temple administered by Thevalappurathu Kudumbayogam, rep. by its President vs Sasikumar Advocate - BENO. G — 100345/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section S.26, Order 7, Rule 1, 2. Status: For hearing on IA. Next hearing: 21st May 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLAL220004362023
e-Filing Number
09-10-2023
Filing Number
100522/2023
Filing Date
09-Oct-2023
Registration No
100345/2023
Registration Date
09-Oct-2023
Court
Munsiff Court, Haripad
Judge
1-Munsiff, Haripad
Last updated 20-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sree Kolathu Devi Temple administered by Thevalappurathu Kudumbayogam, rep. by its President
Adv. BIJU. D
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sasikumar Advocate - BENO. G
-
2.Secretary, Thevalappurathu Kudumbayogam Administrative Committee,rep. by Mohandas
Adv. BENO. G
-
3.Santhosh
Adv. BENO. G,AYYAPPAN S
-
4.Vipindas
Adv. BENO. G,AYYAPPAN S
-
5.Sajeevan
Adv. BENO. G,AYYAPPAN S
-
6.Pramod
Adv. BENO. G,AYYAPPAN S
-
7.Prasanthi Haridasan
Adv. BENO. G,AYYAPPAN S
-
8.Ponnamma
Adv. BENO. G,AYYAPPAN S
-
9.Ullas Kumar
Adv. BENO. G,AYYAPPAN S
-
10.E B Venugopal
Adv. BENO. G
-
11.Beby Sarojam
Adv. BENO. G,AYYAPPAN S
-
12.Kunjaniyan
Adv. BENO. G
Case History
-
21-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
27-Mar-2026
For hearing on IA
Munsiff, Haripad
-
09-Mar-2026
For hearing on IA
Munsiff, Haripad
-
26-Feb-2026
For hearing on IA
Munsiff, Haripad
-
25-Feb-2026
For commission report
Munsiff, Haripad
-
20-Feb-2026
For commission report
Munsiff, Haripad
-
16-Feb-2026
Call on
Munsiff, Haripad
-
12-Feb-2026
For further hearing
Munsiff, Haripad
-
10-Feb-2026
For Objection and hearing
Munsiff, Haripad
-
06-Feb-2026
For hearing on IA
Munsiff, Haripad
-
22-Jan-2026
Issues
Munsiff, Haripad
-
06-Nov-2025
Adjourned
Munsiff, Haripad
-
08-Aug-2025
Issues
Munsiff, Haripad
-
18-Jul-2025
Issues
Munsiff, Haripad
-
07-Mar-2025
OrderView PDF
-
07-Mar-2025
OrderView PDF
Summary The Munsiff Court at Haripad dismissed a petition filed by 12 defendants seeking to implead two banks (Alappuzha District Co-operative Bank and Punjab National Bank) as additional parties to a suit concerning temple administration disputes. The court held that the banks are not necessary or proper parties for effective adjudication, as the dispute is solely between the plaintiff and defendants. Both parties were directed to bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Mar-2025
Issues
Munsiff, Haripad
-
01-Mar-2025
Orders in IA
Munsiff, Haripad
-
24-Jan-2025
Issues
Munsiff, Haripad
-
10-Jan-2025
For hearing on IA
Munsiff, Haripad
-
09-Jan-2025
For hearing on IA
Munsiff, Haripad
-
07-Jan-2025
For hearing on IA
Munsiff, Haripad
-
06-Jan-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff, Haripad
-
04-Jan-2025
Written Statement
Munsiff, Haripad
-
20-Dec-2024
For hearing on IA
Munsiff, Haripad
-
19-Dec-2024
For hearing on IA
Munsiff, Haripad
-
17-Dec-2024
For hearing on IA
Munsiff, Haripad
-
16-Dec-2024
For hearing on IA
Munsiff, Haripad
-
06-Dec-2024
For hearing on IA
Munsiff, Haripad
-
23-Nov-2024
For hearing on IA
Munsiff, Haripad
-
15-Nov-2024
For hearing on IA
Munsiff, Haripad
-
18-Oct-2024
Issues
Munsiff, Haripad
-
01-Aug-2024
Issues
Munsiff, Haripad
-
18-Jul-2024
Issues
Munsiff, Haripad
-
30-May-2024
Issues
Munsiff, Haripad
-
18-May-2024
Written Statement
Munsiff, Haripad
-
11-Mar-2024
Written Statement
Munsiff, Haripad
-
29-Feb-2024
For further hearing
Munsiff, Haripad
-
22-Feb-2024
Orders in IA
Munsiff, Haripad
-
17-Feb-2024
For further hearing
Munsiff, Haripad
-
09-Feb-2024
For hearing on IA
Munsiff, Haripad
-
20-Jan-2024
For hearing on IA
Munsiff, Haripad
-
15-Jan-2024
For hearing on IA
Munsiff, Haripad
-
05-Jan-2024
For hearing on IA
Munsiff, Haripad
-
19-Dec-2023
For hearing on IA
Munsiff, Haripad
-
11-Dec-2023
For hearing on IA
Munsiff, Haripad
-
30-Nov-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Oct-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 100345/2023
Summary The Munsiff Court at Haripad dismissed a petition filed by 12 defendants seeking to implead two banks (Alappuzha District Co-operative Bank and Punjab National Bank) as additional parties to a suit concerning temple administration disputes. The court held that the banks are not necessary or proper parties for effective adjudication, as the dispute is solely between the plaintiff and defendants. Both parties were directed to bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts