Sudharma. J vs Sathiyamma. J Advocate - ARAVINDAKSHAN. R — 100300/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section S26,O7,R1. Disposed: Contested--PRELIMINARY DECREE PASSED. on 21st March 2026.

Case disposed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLAL220004212022

Filing Number

100484/2022

Filing Date

26-Sep-2022

Registration No

100300/2022

Registration Date

26-Sep-2022

Court

Munsiff Court, Haripad

Judge

1-Munsiff, Haripad

Decision Date

21-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PRELIMINARY DECREE PASSED.

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section S26,O7,R1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sudharma. J

    Adv. IBRAHIMKUTTY. M

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sathiyamma. J Advocate - ARAVINDAKSHAN. R

  2. 2.Mohanan. K

    Adv. ARAVINDAKSHAN. R

  3. 3.Soman. K

    Adv. ARAVINDAKSHAN. R

  4. 4.Vijayamma. J

    Adv. ARAVINDAKSHAN. R

  5. 5.Sulekha. J

    Adv. ARAVINDAKSHAN. R

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: Sudharma. J v. Sathiyamma. J & Others (OS. 300/2022) The Munsiff court decreed Sudharma's partition suit, holding that the inherited properties from the intestate deaths of parents Kochunanu (2010) and Janamma (2018) are partible among six co-heirs. The court awarded Sudharma a 1/6 share and the five defendants a joint 5/6 share, ordering partition by metes and bounds into six equal shares. The court rejected Sudharma's prayer for permanent prohibitory injunction restraining defendants from felling trees, finding no substantiating evidence and noting that co-owners cannot be enjoined from using common property. Each party bears their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Munsiff, Haripad

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Munsiff, Haripad

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Order/Judgement

    Munsiff, Haripad

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Munsiff, Haripad

  7. 06-Feb-2026

    Listed to

    Munsiff, Haripad

  8. 29-Nov-2025

    Report on mediation

    Munsiff, Haripad

  9. 30-Oct-2025

    Report on mediation

    Munsiff, Haripad

  10. 18-Oct-2025

    Appearance Of Parties

    Munsiff, Haripad

  11. 04-Jul-2025

    Issues

    Munsiff, Haripad

  12. 24-May-2025

    Issues

    Munsiff, Haripad

  13. 14-Feb-2025

    Issues

    Munsiff, Haripad

  14. 04-Oct-2024

    No sitting notified

    Munsiff, Haripad

  15. 06-Jul-2024

    No sitting notified

    Munsiff, Haripad

  16. 01-Apr-2024

    Adjourned

    Munsiff, Haripad

  17. 12-Jan-2024

    Issues

    Munsiff, Haripad

  18. 13-Nov-2023

    Issues

    Munsiff, Haripad

  19. 17-Aug-2023

    Verify and report

    Munsiff, Haripad

  20. 29-Jun-2023

    Written Statement

    Munsiff, Haripad

  21. 27-Jun-2023

    Written Statement

    Munsiff, Haripad

  22. 01-Mar-2023

    Written Statement

    Munsiff, Haripad

  23. 23-Dec-2022

    Written Statement

    Munsiff, Haripad

  24. 27-Oct-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 26-Sep-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100300/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Sudharma. J v. Sathiyamma. J & Others (OS. 300/2022) The Munsiff court decreed Sudharma's partition suit, holding that the inherited properties from the intestate deaths of parents Kochunanu (2010) and Janamma (2018) are partible among six co-heirs. The court awarded Sudharma a 1/6 share and the five defendants a joint 5/6 share, ordering partition by metes and bounds into six equal shares. The court rejected Sudharma's prayer for permanent prohibitory injunction restraining defendants from felling trees, finding no substantiating evidence and noting that co-owners cannot be enjoined from using common property. Each party bears their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case