Deepthy vs Sanath Advocate - P. Suresh — 100280/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section S26,O7,R1,2. Disposed: Contested--DECREED WITH COST on 30th March 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLAL220003892020
Filing Number
100434/2020
Filing Date
23-Oct-2020
Registration No
100280/2020
Registration Date
23-Oct-2020
Court
Munsiff Court, Haripad
Judge
1-Munsiff, Haripad
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECREED WITH COST
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Deepthy
Adv. AVINASH. S
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sanath Advocate - P. Suresh
-
2.Ullas
Adv. BIJU. C
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
Case Summary: Deepthy v. Sanath Advocate & Ullas (OS 280/2020) The Munsiff's Court granted Deepthy's suit for permanent prohibitory injunction against defendants Sanath and Ullas Kumar. The court found that while the disputed thodu (wetland) is panchayath property vested under the Kerala Panchayath Raj Act, the plaintiff—as exclusive owner of the adjoining property—has the right to unobstructed water drainage through it during monsoons. The defendants' reclamation activities with gravel and felling of trees would impede this essential drainage, depriving the plaintiff of her property's enjoyment. The court permanently restrained the defendants from trespassing into the plaintiff's property, unloading materials, or further reclaiming the thodu. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
Munsiff, Haripad
-
28-Mar-2026
Call on
Munsiff, Haripad
-
25-Mar-2026
Order/ Judgement
Munsiff, Haripad
-
18-Mar-2026
Order/ Judgement
Munsiff, Haripad
-
13-Mar-2026
For further hearing
Munsiff, Haripad
-
05-Mar-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff, Haripad
-
17-Feb-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff, Haripad
-
28-Jan-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff, Haripad
-
27-Jan-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff, Haripad
-
23-Jan-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff, Haripad
-
15-Jan-2026
Issue Summons
Munsiff, Haripad
-
14-Jan-2026
For evidence
Munsiff, Haripad
-
08-Jan-2026
For Defendent Evidence
Munsiff, Haripad
-
07-Jan-2026
Further evidence
Munsiff, Haripad
-
01-Nov-2025
Listed to
Munsiff, Haripad
-
03-Oct-2025
Adjourned
Munsiff, Haripad
-
17-Jun-2025
Listed to
Munsiff, Haripad
-
21-Mar-2025
For evidence
Munsiff, Haripad
-
13-Nov-2024
Call on
Munsiff, Haripad
-
05-Jan-2024
Trial in the list
Munsiff, Haripad
-
30-Nov-2023
Pre trial steps
Munsiff, Haripad
-
04-Sep-2023
Pre trial steps
Munsiff, Haripad
-
26-May-2023
Pre trial steps
Munsiff, Haripad
-
06-Feb-2023
Pre trial steps
Munsiff, Haripad
-
08-Dec-2022
Pre trial steps
Munsiff, Haripad
-
28-Oct-2022
Pre trial steps
Munsiff, Haripad
-
03-Sep-2022
Bcf and steps
Munsiff, Haripad
-
11-Jul-2022
Issues
Munsiff, Haripad
-
25-Jun-2022
Written Statement
Munsiff, Haripad
-
24-Mar-2022
Written Statement
Munsiff, Haripad
-
05-Mar-2022
Written Statement
Munsiff, Haripad
-
25-Jan-2022
Written Statement
Munsiff, Haripad
-
20-Nov-2021
Written Statement
Munsiff, Haripad
-
22-Sep-2021
Written Statement
Munsiff, Haripad
-
13-Aug-2021
Written Statement
Munsiff, Haripad
-
02-Jun-2021
Return of notice
Munsiff, Haripad
-
20-Mar-2021
Return of notice
Munsiff, Haripad
-
26-Feb-2021
Return of notice
Munsiff, Haripad
-
17-Dec-2020
Return of notice
Munsiff, Haripad
-
06-Nov-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Oct-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 100280/2020
Case Summary: Deepthy v. Sanath Advocate & Ullas (OS 280/2020) The Munsiff's Court granted Deepthy's suit for permanent prohibitory injunction against defendants Sanath and Ullas Kumar. The court found that while the disputed thodu (wetland) is panchayath property vested under the Kerala Panchayath Raj Act, the plaintiff—as exclusive owner of the adjoining property—has the right to unobstructed water drainage through it during monsoons. The defendants' reclamation activities with gravel and felling of trees would impede this essential drainage, depriving the plaintiff of her property's enjoyment. The court permanently restrained the defendants from trespassing into the plaintiff's property, unloading materials, or further reclaiming the thodu. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts