Shaji. A vs Sharafudeen. A Advocate - NAUSHAD. S — 100013/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O20,R18. Disposed: Contested--FINAL DECREE PASSED. on 27th March 2026.

FDA - FINAL DECREE APPLICATION

CNR: KLAL220003872022

Case disposed

Filing Number

100447/2022

Filing Date

31-08-2022

Registration No

100013/2022

Registration Date

31-08-2022

Court

Munsiff Court, Haripad

Judge

1-Munsiff, Haripad

Decision Date

27th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--FINAL DECREE PASSED.

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O20,R18
Ia/4/2025 Classification : Advance Application Section Shaji. ASharafudeen. A
Ia/5/2025 Classification : Advance Application Section Sharafudeen. ASalih. A

Petitioner(s)

Shaji. A

Adv. M. Thaha

Respondent(s)

Sharafudeen. A Advocate - NAUSHAD. S

Kamarudeen. A

Adv. NAUSHAD. S

Salih. A

Adv. BENO. G

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Munsiff, Haripad

27-03-2026

Disposed

19-03-2026

Orders in IA

17-03-2026

FOR HEARING

13-03-2026

FOR HEARING

12-03-2026

FOR HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

27-03-2026
Order

Summary The Munsiff Court of Haripad passed a final decree partitioning inherited property among four co-heirs (petitioner Shaji A and respondents Sharafudheen A, Kamarudheen, and Salih A) into equal shares of approximately 2.67-2.68 Ares each, based on an advocate commissioner's survey report prepared after notice to parties without objection. The court allotted specific plot portions to the petitioner and first two respondents as per the commission plan, with the third respondent defaulting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Munsiff Court of Haripad passed a final decree partitioning inherited property among four co-heirs (petitioner Shaji A and respondents Sharafudheen A, Kamarudheen, and Salih A) into equal shares of approximately 2.67-2.68 Ares each, based on an advocate commissioner's survey report prepared after notice to parties without objection. The court allotted specific plot portions to the petitioner and first two respondents as per the commission plan, with the third respondent defaulting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Munsiff Court, Haripad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case