Peethambaran vs Sreenivasan — 100042/2020
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section Order21RXI. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED AS NOT PRESSED on 11th March 2026.
EP - EXECUTION PETITION
CNR: KLAL220003522020
Filing Number
100391/2020
Filing Date
18-09-2020
Registration No
100042/2020
Registration Date
30-09-2020
Court
Munsiff Court, Haripad
Judge
1-Munsiff, Haripad
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED AS NOT PRESSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Peethambaran
Adv. RAJAN PANICKER. T. R
Eswary
Respondent(s)
Sreenivasan
Biju
Sandhya
Chithiran
Usha
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff, Haripad
Disposed
For production of documents/Affidavit
For production of documents/Affidavit
Hearing on Last chance
No Further Time
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-02-2026 | For production of documents/Affidavit |
| 13-02-2026 | For production of documents/Affidavit |
| 11-02-2026 | Hearing on Last chance |
| 31-01-2026 | No Further Time |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Munsiff Court of Haripad dismissed the execution petition (EP 42/2020) filed by decree holders Peethambaran and Easwary against judgment debtors Sreenivasan, Biju, and Sandhya. The petition was dismissed as not pressed after the judgment debtors filed a memo stating they would not proceed further with the execution petition, with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Munsiff Court of Haripad dismissed the execution petition (EP 42/2020) filed by decree holders Peethambaran and Easwary against judgment debtors Sreenivasan, Biju, and Sandhya. The petition was dismissed as not pressed after the judgment debtors filed a memo stating they would not proceed further with the execution petition, with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts