Sreedharan vs Jaya Advocate - M. A. Jayakrishnan — 100177/2019

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section S26,O7,R1,2. Status: For Steps. Next hearing: 27th June 2026.

For Steps Next hearing 27-Jun-2026

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLAL220002942019

Filing Number

100316/2019

Filing Date

11-Jul-2019

Registration No

100177/2019

Registration Date

11-Jul-2019

Court

Munsiff Court, Haripad

Judge

1-Munsiff, Haripad

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section S26,O7,R1,2
Ia/1/2026 Classification : Petition Section Jaya

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sreedharan

    Adv. ARAVINDAKSHAN. R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Jaya Advocate - M. A. Jayakrishnan

  2. 2.Georgekutty

    Adv. M. A. Jayakrishnan,JAYAKRISHNAN M A

Case History

  1. 27-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    For Steps

    Munsiff, Haripad

  3. 21-Mar-2026

    For Steps

    Munsiff, Haripad

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff, Haripad

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Haripad

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff, Haripad

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff, Haripad

  8. 13-Feb-2026

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff, Haripad

  9. 07-Jan-2026

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff, Haripad

  10. 11-Dec-2025

    Call on

    Munsiff, Haripad

  11. 27-Nov-2025

    Call on

    Munsiff, Haripad

  12. 20-Nov-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The review petition filed by the first defendant (Jaya) was allowed. The court reviewed the order dated 03.09.2022 that had marked Exhibit A1 (a security receipt dated 13.10.1992) as evidence. The court found that the document, despite being titled a "receipt," is actually an agreement requiring Rs. 60,000 repayment upon tenancy termination, and therefore constitutes a stamped instrument under the Indian Stamp Act. Since it was executed on stamp paper worth only Rs. 15, it is insufficiently stamped and liable to be impounded. No costs were awarded to either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  13. 20-Nov-2025

    Call on

    Munsiff, Haripad

  14. 17-Nov-2025

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff, Haripad

  15. 07-Nov-2025

    Adjourned

    Munsiff, Haripad

  16. 03-Nov-2025

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff, Haripad

  17. 23-Oct-2025

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff, Haripad

  18. 11-Sep-2025

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff, Haripad

  19. 02-Jul-2025

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff, Haripad

  20. 07-Jun-2025

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff, Haripad

  21. 21-Mar-2025

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff, Haripad

  22. 12-Dec-2024

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff, Haripad

  23. 11-Oct-2024

    No sitting notified

    Munsiff, Haripad

  24. 23-Aug-2024

    No sitting notified

    Munsiff, Haripad

  25. 24-Jul-2024

    No sitting notified

    Munsiff, Haripad

  26. 22-Jun-2024

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Haripad

  27. 12-Apr-2024

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Haripad

  28. 24-Feb-2024

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Haripad

  29. 14-Feb-2024

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Haripad

  30. 19-Jan-2024

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff, Haripad

  31. 15-Dec-2023

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff, Haripad

  32. 27-Oct-2023

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Haripad

  33. 14-Sep-2023

    For Objection and hearing

    Munsiff, Haripad

  34. 05-Aug-2023

    For Objection and hearing

    Munsiff, Haripad

  35. 31-Mar-2023

    For Objection and hearing

    Munsiff, Haripad

  36. 17-Jan-2023

    For Objection and hearing

    Munsiff, Haripad

  37. 23-Nov-2022

    For Objection and hearing

    Munsiff, Haripad

  38. 06-Oct-2022

    For Objection and hearing

    Munsiff, Haripad

  39. 28-Sep-2022

    For cross examination.

    Munsiff, Haripad

  40. 14-Sep-2022

    For cross examination.

    Munsiff, Haripad

  41. 03-Sep-2022

    For cross examination.

    Munsiff, Haripad

  42. 02-Aug-2022

    Listed to

    Munsiff, Haripad

  43. 08-Jul-2022

    Bcf and steps

    Munsiff, Haripad

  44. 06-Jun-2022

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff, Haripad

  45. 28-May-2022

    Issues

    Munsiff, Haripad

  46. 11-Mar-2022

    Issues

    Munsiff, Haripad

  47. 29-Jan-2022

    Issues

    Munsiff, Haripad

  48. 03-Dec-2021

    Issues

    Munsiff, Haripad

  49. 10-Sep-2021

    Payment of balance court fee.

    Munsiff, Haripad

  50. 14-Jul-2021

    Payment of balance court fee.

    Munsiff, Haripad

  51. 20-May-2021

    Payment of balance court fee.

    Munsiff, Haripad

  52. 04-Feb-2021

    Payment of balance court fee.

    Munsiff, Haripad

  53. 09-Dec-2020

    Payment of balance court fee.

    Munsiff, Haripad

  54. 06-Oct-2020

    Payment of balance court fee.

    Munsiff, Haripad

  55. 14-Sep-2020

    Payment of balance court fee.

    Munsiff, Haripad

  56. 20-Aug-2020

    Payment of balance court fee.

    Munsiff, Haripad

  57. 02-Jul-2020

    Payment of balance court fee.

    Munsiff, Haripad

  58. 23-May-2020

    Payment of balance court fee.

    Munsiff, Haripad

  59. 26-Mar-2020

    Payment of balance court fee.

    Munsiff, Haripad

  60. 28-Feb-2020

    Payment of balance court fee.

    Munsiff, Haripad

  61. 10-Jan-2020

    Written Statement

    Munsiff, Haripad

  62. 10-Dec-2019

    Written Statement

    Munsiff, Haripad

  63. 19-Oct-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  64. 11-Jul-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100177/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The review petition filed by the first defendant (Jaya) was allowed. The court reviewed the order dated 03.09.2022 that had marked Exhibit A1 (a security receipt dated 13.10.1992) as evidence. The court found that the document, despite being titled a "receipt," is actually an agreement requiring Rs. 60,000 repayment upon tenancy termination, and therefore constitutes a stamped instrument under the Indian Stamp Act. Since it was executed on stamp paper worth only Rs. 15, it is insufficiently stamped and liable to be impounded. No costs were awarded to either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case