Sindhu vs Subash Advocate - IBRAHIMKUTTY. M — 100076/2020

Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section S26O7R1,2,3,4,5,6,7. Disposed: Uncontested--PLAINT RETURNED on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLAL220001082020

Filing Number

100122/2020

Filing Date

03-Mar-2020

Registration No

100076/2020

Registration Date

03-Mar-2020

Court

Munsiff Court, Haripad

Judge

1-Munsiff, Haripad

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLAINT RETURNED

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section S26O7R1,2,3,4,5,6,7

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sindhu

    Adv. SUJITH. S VATHALLOOR KOYICKAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Subash Advocate - IBRAHIMKUTTY. M

  2. 2.Chandrika

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Munsiff Court of Haripad allowed the plaintiff's petition and returned the plaint for presentation before the Family Court, Mavelikara, finding it lacked jurisdiction to try the suit. The court held that under Section 7(c) of the Family Courts Act, 1984, the Family Court has exclusive jurisdiction over disputes between married parties regarding property matters, and the present suit involving a settlement deed between spouses clearly fell within that jurisdiction. The parties were directed to bear their respective costs, with the plaint to be resubmitted within two months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Munsiff, Haripad

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff, Haripad

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    For Objection and hearing

    Munsiff, Haripad

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Call on

    Munsiff, Haripad

  7. 07-Jan-2026

    Listed to

    Munsiff, Haripad

  8. 15-Nov-2025

    Adjourned

    Munsiff, Haripad

  9. 18-Sep-2025

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff, Haripad

  10. 22-Jul-2025

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff, Haripad

  11. 04-Apr-2025

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff, Haripad

  12. 20-Nov-2024

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff, Haripad

  13. 08-Aug-2024

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff, Haripad

  14. 23-May-2024

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff, Haripad

  15. 05-Mar-2024

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff, Haripad

  16. 02-Feb-2024

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff, Haripad

  17. 25-Nov-2023

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff, Haripad

  18. 24-Aug-2023

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff, Haripad

  19. 27-Jul-2023

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff, Haripad

  20. 11-Jul-2023

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff, Haripad

  21. 13-Mar-2023

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff, Haripad

  22. 02-Dec-2022

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff, Haripad

  23. 28-Oct-2022

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff, Haripad

  24. 24-Aug-2022

    Issues

    Munsiff, Haripad

  25. 26-Jul-2022

    Written Statement

    Munsiff, Haripad

  26. 01-Jul-2022

    Written Statement

    Munsiff, Haripad

  27. 24-Jun-2022

    Written Statement

    Munsiff, Haripad

  28. 18-Mar-2022

    Written Statement

    Munsiff, Haripad

  29. 20-Jan-2022

    Written Statement

    Munsiff, Haripad

  30. 17-Nov-2021

    Written Statement

    Munsiff, Haripad

  31. 09-Sep-2021

    Call on

    Munsiff, Haripad

  32. 28-May-2021

    Call on

    Munsiff, Haripad

  33. 24-Mar-2021

    Call on

    Munsiff, Haripad

  34. 20-Jan-2021

    Call on

    Munsiff, Haripad

  35. 11-Nov-2020

    Call on

    Munsiff, Haripad

  36. 23-Sep-2020

    Call on

    Munsiff, Haripad

  37. 25-Aug-2020

    Call on

    Munsiff, Haripad

  38. 17-Jun-2020

    Call on

    Munsiff, Haripad

  39. 24-Mar-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  40. 03-Mar-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100076/2020

casestatus.in Summary

The Munsiff Court of Haripad allowed the plaintiff's petition and returned the plaint for presentation before the Family Court, Mavelikara, finding it lacked jurisdiction to try the suit. The court held that under Section 7(c) of the Family Courts Act, 1984, the Family Court has exclusive jurisdiction over disputes between married parties regarding property matters, and the present suit involving a settlement deed between spouses clearly fell within that jurisdiction. The parties were directed to bear their respective costs, with the plaint to be resubmitted within two months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case