Mannarasala Nagaraja Swamikal vs Sujatha Advocate - Omar Salim — 6/2026
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 21. Status: For Orders in Ea. Next hearing: 26th May 2026.
EP - EXECUTION PETITION
CNR: KLAL220000342026
Filing Number
6/2026
Filing Date
22-Jan-2026
Registration No
6/2026
Registration Date
22-Jan-2026
Court
Munsiff Court, Haripad
Judge
1-Munsiff, Haripad
Last updated 25-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mannarasala Nagaraja Swamikal
Adv. GOPALAKRISHNAPILLAI. K. V
-
2.Subrahamanyan Namboothiri(Died)
Adv. GOPALAKRISHNAPILLAI. K. V
-
3.Narayanan Namboothiri(Died)
Adv. GOPALAKRISHNAPILLAI. K. V
-
4.Parameswaran Namboothiri
Adv. GOPALAKRISHNAPILLAI. K. V
-
5.Jayakumar
Adv. GOPALAKRISHNAPILLAI. K. V
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sujatha Advocate - Omar Salim
-
2.Siva Priyan
Case History
-
26-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
20-May-2026
For Orders in Ea
Munsiff, Haripad
-
19-May-2026
For Objection and hearing
Munsiff, Haripad
-
10-Apr-2026
For Objection and hearing
Munsiff, Haripad
-
08-Apr-2026
Report on delivery
Munsiff, Haripad
-
07-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
-
07-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The execution petition for a decree dated 27.09.2019 was allowed. The Munsiff's court rejected all objections raised by the judgment debtors, finding them to be dilatory tactics. The court directed the Amin (court officer) to effect delivery of the decree schedule property to the decree holders, dismissing contentions about improper impleadment and ambiguous property description as meritless. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Apr-2026
For Steps
Munsiff, Haripad
-
04-Apr-2026
Order/ Judgement
Munsiff, Haripad
-
24-Mar-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff, Haripad
-
16-Mar-2026
Call on
Munsiff, Haripad
-
12-Mar-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff, Haripad
-
07-Mar-2026
Objection
Munsiff, Haripad
-
24-Feb-2026
Objection
Munsiff, Haripad
-
22-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 6/2026
Summary The execution petition for a decree dated 27.09.2019 was allowed. The Munsiff's court rejected all objections raised by the judgment debtors, finding them to be dilatory tactics. The court directed the Amin (court officer) to effect delivery of the decree schedule property to the decree holders, dismissing contentions about improper impleadment and ambiguous property description as meritless. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts