Mannarasala Nagaraja Swamikal vs Sujatha Advocate - Omar Salim — 6/2026

Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 21. Status: For Orders in EA. Next hearing: 26th May 2026.

EP - EXECUTION PETITION

CNR: KLAL220000342026

For Orders in EA

Next Hearing

26th May 2026

Filing Number

6/2026

Filing Date

22-01-2026

Registration No

6/2026

Registration Date

22-01-2026

Court

Munsiff Court, Haripad

Judge

1-Munsiff, Haripad

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 21
Ea/1/2026 Classification : Obstruction Petition Section Mannarasala Nagaraja Swamikal
Ea/2/2026 Classification : Petition Section Mannarasala Nagaraja SwamikalSujatha
Ea/3/2026 Classification : Petition Section Mannarasala Nagaraja SwamikalSujatha

Petitioner(s)

Mannarasala Nagaraja Swamikal

Adv. GOPALAKRISHNAPILLAI. K. V

Subrahamanyan Namboothiri(Died)

Adv. GOPALAKRISHNAPILLAI. K. V

Narayanan Namboothiri(Died)

Adv. GOPALAKRISHNAPILLAI. K. V

Parameswaran Namboothiri

Adv. GOPALAKRISHNAPILLAI. K. V

Jayakumar

Adv. GOPALAKRISHNAPILLAI. K. V

Respondent(s)

Sujatha Advocate - Omar Salim

Siva Priyan

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Munsiff, Haripad

20-05-2026

For Orders in EA

19-05-2026

For Objection and hearing

10-04-2026

For Objection and hearing

08-04-2026

Report on delivery

07-04-2026

For Steps

Interim Orders

07-04-2026
Order
07-04-2026
Order

Summary The execution petition for a decree dated 27.09.2019 was allowed. The Munsiff's court rejected all objections raised by the judgment debtors, finding them to be dilatory tactics. The court directed the Amin (court officer) to effect delivery of the decree schedule property to the decree holders, dismissing contentions about improper impleadment and ambiguous property description as meritless. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The execution petition for a decree dated 27.09.2019 was allowed. The Munsiff's court rejected all objections raised by the judgment debtors, finding them to be dilatory tactics. The court directed the Amin (court officer) to effect delivery of the decree schedule property to the decree holders, dismissing contentions about improper impleadment and ambiguous property description as meritless. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Munsiff Court, Haripad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case