Ayyappan vs Vazhappally Munnila Kizhakku Nair Service Society Advocate - RAJASEKHARAN. B, RENJINI R PILLAI — 100018/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED AS NOT PRESSED on 01st April 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLAL220000292025
e-Filing Number
15-01-2025
Filing Number
33/2025
Filing Date
16-01-2025
Registration No
100018/2025
Registration Date
16-01-2025
Court
Munsiff Court, Haripad
Judge
1-Munsiff, Haripad
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED AS NOT PRESSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ayyappan
Adv. SANKARAN NAMPOOTHIRI K
Respondent(s)
Vazhappally Munnila Kizhakku Nair Service Society Advocate - RAJASEKHARAN. B, RENJINI R PILLAI
Presidant
Adv. RAJASEKHARAN. B,RENJINI R PILLAI
NSS Kartikappally Taluk Union
Registrar of NSS Karayogams
Adv. RAJASEKHARAN. B
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff, Haripad
Disposed
For evidence
For evidence
BCF and steps
BCF and steps
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | For evidence | |
| 27-02-2026 | For evidence | |
| 15-01-2026 | BCF and steps | |
| 15-11-2025 | BCF and steps |
Interim Orders
Court Summary The Munsiff Court of Haripad allowed the plaintiff's petition for interim injunction on April 10, 2025. The court found that the NSS Karayogam's removal of the plaintiff from primary membership was procedurally defective, particularly because the Karayogam Registrar's mandatory approval was not obtained as required by the bye-laws. The court granted an interim injunction restraining the defendants from obstructing the plaintiff's rights as a member until proper approval is received. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Summary The Munsiff Court of Haripad allowed the plaintiff's petition for interim injunction on April 10, 2025. The court found that the NSS Karayogam's removal of the plaintiff from primary membership was procedurally defective, particularly because the Karayogam Registrar's mandatory approval was not obtained as required by the bye-laws. The court granted an interim injunction restraining the defendants from obstructing the plaintiff's rights as a member until proper approval is received. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts