Sulochana vs T P Prasad Advocate - Amithab Sankar — 100001/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 11th March 2026.
EP - EXECUTION PETITION
CNR: KLAL220000062025
e-Filing Number
04-01-2025
Filing Number
6/2025
Filing Date
06-Jan-2025
Registration No
100001/2025
Registration Date
06-Jan-2025
Court
Munsiff Court, Haripad
Judge
1-Munsiff, Haripad
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Last updated 12-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sulochana
Adv. LILLY. D
Respondent(s)
-
1.T P Prasad Advocate - Amithab Sankar
-
2.P Candramohanan
Adv. Amithab Sankar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Order
The Munsiff Court at Haripad dismissed the execution petition filed by Sulochana against the Gurudeva Trust (represented by T. P. Prasad and P. Chandramohan) for default. The court rejected the petition because the judgment debtors failed to produce the required encumbrance certificate, valuation certificate, and draft sale proclamation despite being given repeated opportunities to do so. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
Munsiff, Haripad
-
26-Feb-2026
For production of documents/Affidavit
Munsiff, Haripad
-
09-Feb-2026
For production of documents/Affidavit
Munsiff, Haripad
-
20-Jan-2026
Hearing on Last chance
Munsiff, Haripad
-
12-Dec-2025
For production of documents/Affidavit
Munsiff, Haripad
-
27-Nov-2025
For reports
Munsiff, Haripad
-
13-Nov-2025
For Steps
Munsiff, Haripad
-
10-Sep-2025
For Steps
Munsiff, Haripad
-
15-Jul-2025
For Steps
Munsiff, Haripad
-
03-Apr-2025
Objection
Munsiff, Haripad
-
14-Mar-2025
Issue notice
Munsiff, Haripad
-
06-Jan-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Jan-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 100001/2025
The Munsiff Court at Haripad dismissed the execution petition filed by Sulochana against the Gurudeva Trust (represented by T. P. Prasad and P. Chandramohan) for default. The court rejected the petition because the judgment debtors failed to produce the required encumbrance certificate, valuation certificate, and draft sale proclamation despite being given repeated opportunities to do so. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts