Swathy vs Rajesh — 106/2025

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12,23(2). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

MC - MISCELLANEOUS & MAINTENANCE CASE

CNR: KLAL190023272025

Filing Number

2102/2025

Filing Date

06-Nov-2025

Registration No

106/2025

Registration Date

07-Nov-2025

Court

JFMC II, Mavelikkara

Judge

1-Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12,23(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Swathy

    Adv. Ahallya

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rajesh

  2. 2.Valsala

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara dismissed a domestic violence petition filed by Swathy under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, against her husband Rajesh and another respondent. The petition was dismissed for default because the petitioner was continuously absent from court proceedings and failed to submit any instructions or evidence despite being represented by counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  4. 21-Feb-2026

    exparte evidence

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  5. 23-Jan-2026

    exparte evidence

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  6. 18-Dec-2025

    No sitting notified

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  7. 07-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 06-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 106/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara dismissed a domestic violence petition filed by Swathy under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, against her husband Rajesh and another respondent. The petition was dismissed for default because the petitioner was continuously absent from court proceedings and failed to submit any instructions or evidence despite being represented by counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case