VILASINI vs SOBHA. V — 500438/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Act Section 138. Disposed: Contested--AQUITTED on 29th April 2026.

Case disposed

ST - SUMMARY TRIAL

CNR: KLAL190013092024

Filing Number

501309/2024

Filing Date

01-Jul-2024

Registration No

500438/2024

Registration Date

01-Jul-2024

Court

JFMC II, Mavelikkara

Judge

1-Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

Decision Date

29-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--AQUITTED

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Act Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VILASINI

    Adv. VISHNU NARAYANA. K. S, RATHEESH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SOBHA. V

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara acquitted the accused Sobha of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding her not guilty. The court determined that while the cheque execution was proved, the accused successfully rebutted the statutory presumptions by establishing a probable defence that the cheque was originally issued to the complainant's son (a financier) as security for a ₹40,000 loan in 2019, and was subsequently misused by the complainant. The court noted discrepancies in the legal notice documents and the complainant's failure to prove sufficient financial capacity to lend the amount, leading to the acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  4. 25-Apr-2026

    Order/Judgement

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  5. 22-Apr-2026

    No sitting notified

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  6. 18-Apr-2026

    Order/Judgement

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  7. 07-Apr-2026

    For further hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  8. 31-Mar-2026

    Order/Judgement

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  9. 26-Mar-2026

    Order/Judgement

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  10. 19-Mar-2026

    For further hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  11. 12-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  12. 06-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  13. 02-Mar-2026

    Further evidence

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  14. 26-Feb-2026

    Further evidence

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  15. 25-Feb-2026

    Further evidence

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  16. 20-Feb-2026

    Orders in IA

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  17. 17-Feb-2026

    Orders in IA

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  18. 09-Feb-2026

    For Orders in Ea

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  19. 06-Feb-2026

    For hearing in Cmp

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  20. 31-Jan-2026

    Order/Judgement

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  21. 22-Jan-2026

    For Hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  22. 15-Jan-2026

    For Hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  23. 12-Jan-2026

    For Hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  24. 08-Jan-2026

    No Further Time

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  25. 30-Dec-2025

    For Hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  26. 29-Dec-2025

    Defence Evidence

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  27. 23-Dec-2025

    Defence Evidence

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  28. 05-Dec-2025

    Appearance of Accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  29. 02-Dec-2025

    Appearance of Accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  30. 01-Dec-2025

    Call on

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  31. 20-Nov-2025

    Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  32. 23-Oct-2025

    NBW to cws

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  33. 18-Sep-2025

    NBW to cws

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  34. 30-Aug-2025

    No sitting notified

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  35. 07-Aug-2025

    NBW to cws

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  36. 05-Jul-2025

    Issue bailable warrant to witness

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  37. 12-Jun-2025

    Issue bailable warrant to witness

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  38. 25-Apr-2025

    To summon witness

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  39. 22-Mar-2025

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  40. 13-Mar-2025

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  41. 20-Feb-2025

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  42. 23-Jan-2025

    for evidence.

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  43. 20-Jan-2025

    Issue NBW

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  44. 12-Dec-2024

    Return of summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  45. 29-Oct-2024

    Issue Summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  46. 13-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  47. 01-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 500438/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara acquitted the accused Sobha of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding her not guilty. The court determined that while the cheque execution was proved, the accused successfully rebutted the statutory presumptions by establishing a probable defence that the cheque was originally issued to the complainant's son (a financier) as security for a ₹40,000 loan in 2019, and was subsequently misused by the complainant. The court noted discrepancies in the legal notice documents and the complainant's failure to prove sufficient financial capacity to lend the amount, leading to the acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case