Thulaseedharan vs Suresh P.S Advocate - ZAMEER P S, ZAMEER P S — 500730/2020
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--CONVICTED on 30th April 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLAL190011552020
Filing Number
501138/2020
Filing Date
22-09-2020
Registration No
500730/2020
Registration Date
22-09-2020
Court
JFMC II, Mavelikkara
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara
Decision Date
30th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CONVICTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Thulaseedharan
Adv. M Smithesh,K/713/2010
Respondent(s)
Suresh P.S Advocate - ZAMEER P S, ZAMEER P S
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
Issue notice
Issue NBW
Issue NBW
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-04-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 30-03-2026 | Issue notice |
| 12-03-2026 | Issue NBW |
| 26-02-2026 | Issue NBW |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court convicted accused Suresh PS under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring a cheque of Rs. 5,00,000 issued to the complainant. The court found that the accused failed to rebut the statutory presumptions under Sections 118(a) and 139 of the Act, having admitted his signature on the cheque and provided no credible defense. The accused was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 7,65,000 (including compensation to the complainant), with one month simple imprisonment as default punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court convicted accused Suresh PS under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring a cheque of Rs. 5,00,000 issued to the complainant. The court found that the accused failed to rebut the statutory presumptions under Sections 118(a) and 139 of the Act, having admitted his signature on the cheque and provided no credible defense. The accused was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 7,65,000 (including compensation to the complainant), with one month simple imprisonment as default punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts