Ramachandran vs Radhakrishnan — 537/2022

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSAL BY TRANSFER on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CALENDAR CASE

CNR: KLAL190011142022

Filing Number

604/2022

Filing Date

31-Dec-2022

Registration No

537/2022

Registration Date

31-Dec-2022

Court

JFMC II, Mavelikkara

Judge

1-Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSAL BY TRANSFER

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ramachandran

    Adv. G.Pramod kumar, G.Pramod kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Radhakrishnan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Mavelikara Judicial Magistrate Court dismissed the cheque bounce complaint (U/s 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act) filed by Ramachandran against Radhakrishnan, finding it lacked territorial jurisdiction. The court determined that since the cheque was presented for payment at Alappuzha District Co-Operative Bank (outside its jurisdiction), the case must be filed before the proper court having jurisdiction over the payee bank's location. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 19-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    For Orders in Ea

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    For Orders in Ea

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  7. 28-Feb-2026

    For Hearing

    Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

  8. 19-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 31-Dec-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 537/2022

casestatus.in Summary

The Mavelikara Judicial Magistrate Court dismissed the cheque bounce complaint (U/s 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act) filed by Ramachandran against Radhakrishnan, finding it lacked territorial jurisdiction. The court determined that since the cheque was presented for payment at Alappuzha District Co-Operative Bank (outside its jurisdiction), the case must be filed before the proper court having jurisdiction over the payee bank's location. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case