SI OF NOORANADU PS vs Muhammad Ashiq — 500682/2021
Case under Ipc \ Section 447,294(B),341,506(i). Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED on 31st March 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLAL190009992021
Filing Number
502000/2021
Filing Date
06-10-2023
Registration No
500682/2021
Registration Date
06-10-2023
Court
JFMC II, Mavelikkara
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara
Decision Date
31st March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--AQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
118
Police Station
Nooranad Police Station
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SI OF NOORANADU PS (Police Station)
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Muhammad Ashiq
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara
Disposed
Order/Judgement
Order/Judgement
Order/ Judgement
NBW to cws
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 31-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-03-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 23-03-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 16-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 09-02-2026 | NBW to cws |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CC.682/2021 Muhammad Ashiq was acquitted of charges under IPC sections 447 (criminal trespass), 341 (wrongful restraint), and 506(i) (criminal intimidation) after all material prosecution witnesses turned hostile. The informant PW1 stated the matter was settled between parties and had no complaint against the accused, while occurrence witnesses PW2 and PW3 claimed no knowledge of the incident. Finding insufficient evidence, the court acquitted the accused and cancelled his bail bond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC.682/2021 Muhammad Ashiq was acquitted of charges under IPC sections 447 (criminal trespass), 341 (wrongful restraint), and 506(i) (criminal intimidation) after all material prosecution witnesses turned hostile. The informant PW1 stated the matter was settled between parties and had no complaint against the accused, while occurrence witnesses PW2 and PW3 claimed no knowledge of the incident. Finding insufficient evidence, the court acquitted the accused and cancelled his bail bond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts