State of Kerala Police vs Sharukh Khan — 500180/2025
Case under Ipc \ Section 143,147,148,149,323,341,324,294(B),326,506(ii),201. Status: For return of summons. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLAL190007292025
Next Hearing
06th July 2026
e-Filing Number
28-04-2025
Filing Number
729/2025
Filing Date
25-04-2025
Registration No
500180/2025
Registration Date
28-04-2025
Court
JFMC II, Mavelikkara
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara
FIR Details
FIR Number
1108
Police Station
Nooranad Police Station
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala Police
Adv. Asst Public Prosecutor, Mavelikara
Respondent(s)
Sharukh Khan
ARJUN
AKHIL SUNILKUMAR
Adv. null
ADITHYA
NITHIN KRISHNA
ABHIJITH
ABHISHEK.M
ASLUM ASHRAF
Adv. ASOKAKUMAR K
R MANAS
PRINCE R
JISHNU M
ALAN V ROY
KRISHNAKUMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara
For return of summons
To summon witness
Hearing on Charge
For hearing in CMP
For further hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-06-2026 | For return of summons |
| 29-05-2026 | To summon witness |
| 19-05-2026 | Hearing on Charge |
| 15-05-2026 | For hearing in CMP |
| 12-05-2026 | For further hearing |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Case 500180/2025 Dr. K. Krishnakumar, principal of Sri Buddha Engineering College (13th accused), petitioned for discharge from charges under the Kerala Prohibition of Ragging Act, 1998 and related IPC sections. The court granted the petition and discharged him, finding insufficient prima facie grounds to proceed. The magistrate determined that Section 7 of the Ragging Act requires a written complaint to the institution head to trigger statutory duties under Section 6, and no evidence showed such complaint was ever made to the petitioner, thereby negating liability for failing to comply with mandatory reporting procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Case 500180/2025 Dr. K. Krishnakumar, principal of Sri Buddha Engineering College (13th accused), petitioned for discharge from charges under the Kerala Prohibition of Ragging Act, 1998 and related IPC sections. The court granted the petition and discharged him, finding insufficient prima facie grounds to proceed. The magistrate determined that Section 7 of the Ragging Act requires a written complaint to the institution head to trigger statutory duties under Section 6, and no evidence showed such complaint was ever made to the petitioner, thereby negating liability for failing to comply with mandatory reporting procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts