ALIYA FATHIMA vs MUHAMMED HANEEFA Advocate - SHEMIL — 500126/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act \ Section 138. Status: Stayed by High Court. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.

CC - CALENDAR CASE

CNR: KLAL190004452024

Stayed by High Court

Next Hearing

01st July 2026

Filing Number

500445/2024

Filing Date

12-04-2024

Registration No

500126/2024

Registration Date

12-04-2024

Court

JFMC II, Mavelikkara

Judge

1-Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act \ Section 138
Crl.MP/1944/2025 Classification : Absent Petition Section MUHAMMED HANEEFA
Crl.MP/2130/2025 Classification : Warrant Recall Petition Section MUHAMMED HANEEFA
Crl.MP/2249/2025 Classification : Petition Section ALIYA FATHIMAMUHAMMED HANEEFA
Crl.MP/2377/2025 Classification : Petition Section MUHAMMED HANEEFAALIYA FATHIMA
Crl.MP/1/2026 Classification : Application To Recall Witness Section MUHAMMED HANEEFA
Crl.MP/2/2026 Classification : Advance Application Section MUHAMMED HANEEFA
Crl.MP/3/2026 Classification : Petition Section ALIYA FATHIMA

Petitioner(s)

ALIYA FATHIMA

Adv. ANIL BABU, Adv ANIL

Respondent(s)

MUHAMMED HANEEFA Advocate - SHEMIL

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mavelikara

01-04-2026

Stayed by High Court

12-03-2026

Call on

24-02-2026

Call on

18-02-2026

Call on

16-02-2026

Order/Judgement

Interim Orders

16-02-2026
Order

Case Summary Petition Dismissed. The court rejected the accused's petition to recall the complainant (PW1) for further cross-examination in a Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 case. The court held that mere change of counsel is not grounds to recall a witness, especially after the witness has already been cross-examined twice and the case is at the judgment stage. The petition lacked any other valid justification for recall. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Petition Dismissed. The court rejected the accused's petition to recall the complainant (PW1) for further cross-examination in a Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 case. The court held that mere change of counsel is not grounds to recall a witness, especially after the witness has already been cross-examined twice and the case is at the judgment stage. The petition lacked any other valid justification for recall. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

JFMC II, Mavelikkara All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case