Ratheesh S(CMP 2207/ vs Radhakrishnan Advocate - VINCENT JOSEPH — 402039/2020
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act \ Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--ACQUITTED U/S 255 BNSS on 25th April 2026.
ST - SUMMARY TRIAL
CNR: KLAL180026202020
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2620/2020
Filing Date
23-11-2020
Registration No
402039/2020
Registration Date
23-11-2020
Court
JFMC I, Mavelikkara
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Mavelikara
Decision Date
25th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ACQUITTED U/S 255 BNSS
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ratheesh S(CMP 2207/
Respondent(s)
Radhakrishnan Advocate - VINCENT JOSEPH
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Mavelikara
Disposed
Appearance Of Parties
for evidence.
for evidence.
for evidence.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 30-03-2026 | Appearance Of Parties | |
| 11-03-2026 | for evidence. | |
| 16-02-2026 | for evidence. | |
| 29-01-2026 | for evidence. |
Interim Orders
The Judicial First Class Magistrate Court in Mavelikara acquitted the accused Radhakrishnan under Section 256 of CrPC in a cheque bounce case (Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act). The court found that despite sufficient opportunities granted, the complainant remained absent without reason and his counsel was unprepared to adduce evidence, making further adjournments purposeless. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Judicial First Class Magistrate Court in Mavelikara acquitted the accused Radhakrishnan under Section 256 of CrPC in a cheque bounce case (Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act). The court found that despite sufficient opportunities granted, the complainant remained absent without reason and his counsel was unprepared to adduce evidence, making further adjournments purposeless. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts