Smithamol Sunny vs Jijo Stephan Jacob Advocate - Manu Tom Thomas — 400009/2019

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 23(2). Status: For evidence. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.

MC - MISCELLANEOUS & MAINTENANCE CASE

CNR: KLAL180006462019

For evidence

Next Hearing

01st June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

646/2019

Filing Date

26-02-2019

Registration No

400009/2019

Registration Date

26-02-2019

Court

JFMC I, Mavelikkara

Judge

1-Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Mavelikara

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 23(2)
Crl.MP/1/2026 Classification : Adjournment Application
Crl.MP/2/2026 Classification : Advance Application
Crl.MP/3/2026 Classification : Adjournment Application Section Jijo Stephan Jacob

Petitioner(s)

Smithamol Sunny

Adv. P Anil

Steve Jacob

Adam

Respondent(s)

Jijo Stephan Jacob Advocate - Manu Tom Thomas

P S Jacob

Lillikutty

Adv. Manu Tom Thomas

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Mavelikara

01-04-2026

For evidence

09-03-2026

Appearance Of Parties

13-02-2026

Appearance Of Parties

20-01-2026

For evidence

05-01-2026

Appearance Of Parties

Interim Orders

07-04-2025
Order

Summary: The petition filed under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (PWDV) seeking constitution of a medical board to examine a child with a heart condition was dismissed. The court held that only an "aggrieved person" is entitled to seek relief under the PWDV Act, and since no specific prayer for surgical expenses was made in the maintenance application, the medical examination was not a material fact necessary for deciding the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition filed under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (PWDV) seeking constitution of a medical board to examine a child with a heart condition was dismissed. The court held that only an "aggrieved person" is entitled to seek relief under the PWDV Act, and since no specific prayer for surgical expenses was made in the maintenance application, the medical examination was not a material fact necessary for deciding the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

JFMC I, Mavelikkara All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case