SURESH KUMAR vs SHAJI KUMAR — 100059/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section XLIrule1. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

AS - CIVIL APPEAL

CNR: KLAL140007232024

e-Filing Number

10-10-2024

Filing Number

100324/2024

Filing Date

15-Oct-2024

Registration No

100059/2024

Registration Date

15-Oct-2024

Court

Addl District Court, Mavelikkara/Rent Control Appellate Authority

Judge

1-Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section XLIrule1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SURESH KUMAR

    Adv. MUJEEB REHUMAN A

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHAJI KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    The Additional District Judge reversed the lower court's decree, finding that the plaintiff failed to adequately prove the execution of a contested ₹17,10,000 loan agreement despite evidence of some monetary transactions between the parties. The court noted critical deficiencies: the document lacked proper witnessing, contained blank spaces and corrections, witnesses were not shown the document to identify it, and the plaintiff did not send it for forensic verification—all fatal to proving the agreement's authenticity. Consequently, the appeal was allowed with costs and the trial court's judgment was set aside. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

  8. 19-Feb-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

  9. 10-Feb-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

  10. 05-Feb-2026

    For further hearing

    Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

  11. 29-Jan-2026

    For further hearing

    Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

  12. 24-Jan-2026

    For Hearing

    Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

  13. 21-Jan-2026

    For Hearing

    Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

  14. 14-Jan-2026

    Await Records

    Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

  15. 05-Jan-2026

    For Hearing

    Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

  16. 09-Dec-2025

    Adjourned

    Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

  17. 28-Nov-2025

    For Hearing

    Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

  18. 22-Nov-2025

    For Hearing

    Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

  19. 14-Nov-2025

    For further hearing

    Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

  20. 07-Nov-2025

    For further hearing

    Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

  21. 06-Nov-2025

    For Hearing

    Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

  22. 27-Oct-2025

    For further hearing

    Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

  23. 21-Oct-2025

    For Hearing

    Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

  24. 17-Oct-2025

    For Hearing

    Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

  25. 08-Oct-2025

    For Hearing

    Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

  26. 15-Sep-2025

    For Hearing

    Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

  27. 25-Aug-2025

    For Hearing

    Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

  28. 19-Aug-2025

    For Hearing

    Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

  29. 26-Jul-2025

    For Hearing

    Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

  30. 18-Jul-2025

    For Hearing

    Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

  31. 02-Jul-2025

    Call on

    Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

  32. 22-May-2025

    Call on

    Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

  33. 10-Apr-2025

    Call on

    Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

  34. 02-Apr-2025

    Call on

    Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

  35. 18-Feb-2025

    Call on

    Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

  36. 21-Jan-2025

    Objection

    Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

  37. 18-Dec-2024

    Objection

    Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

  38. 23-Nov-2024

    Objection

    Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

  39. 16-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  40. 15-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100059/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional District Judge reversed the lower court's decree, finding that the plaintiff failed to adequately prove the execution of a contested ₹17,10,000 loan agreement despite evidence of some monetary transactions between the parties. The court noted critical deficiencies: the document lacked proper witnessing, contained blank spaces and corrections, witnesses were not shown the document to identify it, and the plaintiff did not send it for forensic verification—all fatal to proving the agreement's authenticity. Consequently, the appeal was allowed with costs and the trial court's judgment was set aside. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case