State of Kerala vs Akhil Raj Advocate - Anish.K, Anish.K — 100681/2020
Case under Ipc \ Section 506(i), 109, 324, 307. Status: FOR HEARING. Next hearing: 21st May 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: KLAL140004392020
Next Hearing
21st May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
100681/2020
Filing Date
05-01-2021
Registration No
100681/2020
Registration Date
05-01-2021
Court
Addl District Court, Mavelikkara/Rent Control Appellate Authority
Judge
1-Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority
FIR Details
FIR Number
1291
Police Station
Nooranad Police Station
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala
Adv. Addl. Public Prosecutor, Mav elikara
Respondent(s)
Akhil Raj Advocate - Anish.K, Anish.K
Rahul Raj
Adv. Anish .K
Vijeesh Kumar
Adv. Anish.K,ADARSH.U
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority
FOR HEARING
for evidence.
for evidence.
For reports
For reports
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | FOR HEARING | |
| 17-03-2026 | for evidence. | |
| 12-03-2026 | for evidence. | |
| 09-03-2026 | For reports | |
| 05-03-2026 | For reports |
Interim Orders
Summary Bail Granted. The Additional Sessions Judge allowed the bail petition of Rahul Raj (Accused No. 2), who was charged with criminal intimidation, abetment, voluntarily causing hurt, and attempted murder under IPC Sections 506(i), 109, 324, and 307. The court found that since the alleged offence occurred in 2018, the case is ripe for trial, and further detention is unnecessary. Bail was granted on a ₹50,000 bond with two sureties and standard conditions including court appearance, no witness intimidation, and territorial jurisdiction restriction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary Bail Granted. The Additional Sessions Judge allowed the bail petition of Rahul Raj (Accused No. 2), who was charged with criminal intimidation, abetment, voluntarily causing hurt, and attempted murder under IPC Sections 506(i), 109, 324, and 307. The court found that since the alleged offence occurred in 2018, the case is ripe for trial, and further detention is unnecessary. Bail was granted on a ₹50,000 bond with two sureties and standard conditions including court appearance, no witness intimidation, and territorial jurisdiction restriction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts