State of Kerala (Police) vs Anju Advocate - ANISH MON K T — 100378/2018

Case under Ipc \ Section 302. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 11th March 2026.

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: KLAL140003572018

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

100120/2018

Filing Date

07-05-2018

Registration No

100378/2018

Registration Date

07-05-2018

Court

Addl District Court, Mavelikkara/Rent Control Appellate Authority

Judge

1-Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

Acts & Sections

IPC \ Section 302
Crl.MP/2545/2025 Classification : Petition Section State of Kerala (Police)
Crl.MP/2634/2025 Classification : Application For Permission To Examine Through Vc Section State of Kerala (Police)Anju
Crl.MP/1/2026 Classification : Petition Section State of Kerala (Police)
Crl.MP(Ab)/1/2026 Classification : Absent Petition Section Anju
Crl.MP(Ab)/2/2026 Classification : Absent Petition Section Anju

Petitioner(s)

State of Kerala (Police)

Respondent(s)

Anju Advocate - ANISH MON K T

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

11-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

Order/ Judgement

26-02-2026

Order/ Judgement

25-02-2026

Defence Evidence

24-02-2026

Adjourned

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Judgement

Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Alappuzha acquitted Anju of murder charges (IPC Section 302) due to insufficient evidence, finding that eyewitnesses at the scene contradicted the prosecution's case and none supported the allegation that she stabbed her brother. The court held that mere recovery of a weapon based on confession alone cannot establish guilt without corroborating eyewitness testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Alappuzha acquitted Anju of murder charges (IPC Section 302) due to insufficient evidence, finding that eyewitnesses at the scene contradicted the prosecution's case and none supported the allegation that she stabbed her brother. The court held that mere recovery of a weapon based on confession alone cannot establish guilt without corroborating eyewitness testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Addl District Court, Mavelikkara/Rent Control Appellate Authority All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case