Suchetha vs Radhakrishnan — 12/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 43 Rule 1. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CMA - CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL

CNR: KLAL140002282026

Filing Number

12/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

12/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

Addl District Court, Mavelikkara/Rent Control Appellate Authority

Judge

1-Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 43 Rule 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Suchetha

    Adv. P VISWANATHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Radhakrishnan

  2. 2.Liji

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Summary The Additional District Judge allowed the appellant's appeal and granted an interim prohibitory injunction. The court found that the appellant (property owner) has a legal right to use the E schedule pathway through the respondents' property to access her land from the public road. The court determined there was a prima facie case of easement of necessity and easement by implied grant, as the pathway was the only access to her property and commission reports confirmed no alternative routes existed. The respondents were restrained from obstructing this pathway. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

  5. 07-Apr-2026

    Order/Judgement

    Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

  6. 30-Mar-2026

    Order/Judgement

    Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

  7. 25-Mar-2026

    Await Records

    Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

  8. 19-Mar-2026

    Await Records

    Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

  9. 17-Mar-2026

    For Objection and hearing

    Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

  10. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 12/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional District Judge allowed the appellant's appeal and granted an interim prohibitory injunction. The court found that the appellant (property owner) has a legal right to use the E schedule pathway through the respondents' property to access her land from the public road. The court determined there was a prima facie case of easement of necessity and easement by implied grant, as the pathway was the only access to her property and commission reports confirmed no alternative routes existed. The respondents were restrained from obstructing this pathway. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case