Babu Sankeran vs Thankamma — 100096/2024
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 29. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 13th March 2026.
Crl.A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: KLAL140002272024
e-Filing Number
23-04-2024
Filing Number
100055/2024
Filing Date
23-04-2024
Registration No
100096/2024
Registration Date
07-05-2024
Court
Addl District Court, Mavelikkara/Rent Control Appellate Authority
Judge
1-Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
FIR Details
Police Station
Haripad Police Station
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Babu Sankeran
Adv. M THAHA
Ambili
Adv. M THAHA
Pramod
Adv. M THAHA
Respondent(s)
Thankamma
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
For Payment
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement | |
| 26-02-2026 | FOR HEARING | |
| 18-02-2026 | FOR HEARING | |
| 16-02-2026 | For Payment |
Final Orders / Judgements
Judgement
Interim Orders
The Additional Sessions Judge partially allowed the criminal appeal but reduced the monthly maintenance obligation from ₹10,000 to ₹7,000, finding that the appellant's non-compliance with court orders could not justify a complete stay. The court held that while the appellant (a low-grade employee with severe health issues and two dependent children) has genuine financial constraints, the respondent (elderly mother) must also be supported, and court orders must be complied with; arrears must also be paid, with a conditional stay on striking off the defense if payment is made within two months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional Sessions Judge partially allowed the criminal appeal but reduced the monthly maintenance obligation from ₹10,000 to ₹7,000, finding that the appellant's non-compliance with court orders could not justify a complete stay. The court held that while the appellant (a low-grade employee with severe health issues and two dependent children) has genuine financial constraints, the respondent (elderly mother) must also be supported, and court orders must be complied with; arrears must also be paid, with a conditional stay on striking off the defense if payment is made within two months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts