State of Kerala Police vs Sanjay Ore — 100098/2025

Case under Ipc \ Section 302. Status: FOR HEARING. Next hearing: 23rd May 2026.

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: KLAL140001312025

FOR HEARING

Next Hearing

23rd May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

58/2025

Filing Date

16-01-2025

Registration No

100098/2025

Registration Date

22-01-2025

Court

Addl District Court, Mavelikkara/Rent Control Appellate Authority

Judge

1-Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

FIR Details

FIR Number

803

Police Station

Nooranad Police Station

Year

2014

Acts & Sections

IPC \ Section 302
Crl.MP/2511/2025 Classification : Discharge Petition Section Sanjay Ore

Petitioner(s)

State of Kerala Police

Adv. Addl. Public Prosecutor Mavelikara

Respondent(s)

Sanjay Ore

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority

10-04-2026

FOR HEARING

09-04-2026

Adjourned

09-03-2026

FOR HEARING

16-02-2026

For production of accused

16-01-2026

Call on

Interim Orders

07-01-2026
Order

Summary: The court dismissed the accused's petition for discharge under Section 300 Cr.P.C. (double jeopardy protection). Though the accused was previously acquitted by the High Court in 2021 due to defective investigation, the court found that the subsequent re-investigation by a superior officer rectified those shortcomings and charged the same accused afresh. The court held that the bar against double jeopardy does not apply when a retrial is ordered following an unfair initial investigation, as the exceptional circumstances justified the re-investigation and fresh prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court dismissed the accused's petition for discharge under Section 300 Cr.P.C. (double jeopardy protection). Though the accused was previously acquitted by the High Court in 2021 due to defective investigation, the court found that the subsequent re-investigation by a superior officer rectified those shortcomings and charged the same accused afresh. The court held that the bar against double jeopardy does not apply when a retrial is ordered following an unfair initial investigation, as the exceptional circumstances justified the re-investigation and fresh prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Addl District Court, Mavelikkara/Rent Control Appellate Authority All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case