State of Kerala Police vs Sanjay Ore — 100098/2025
Case under Ipc \ Section 302. Status: FOR HEARING. Next hearing: 23rd May 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: KLAL140001312025
Next Hearing
23rd May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
58/2025
Filing Date
16-01-2025
Registration No
100098/2025
Registration Date
22-01-2025
Court
Addl District Court, Mavelikkara/Rent Control Appellate Authority
Judge
1-Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority
FIR Details
FIR Number
803
Police Station
Nooranad Police Station
Year
2014
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala Police
Adv. Addl. Public Prosecutor Mavelikara
Respondent(s)
Sanjay Ore
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Addl.Dist.and Sessions Judge-I Mavelikara/ Rent Control Appellate Authority
FOR HEARING
Adjourned
FOR HEARING
For production of accused
Call on
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | FOR HEARING | |
| 09-04-2026 | Adjourned | |
| 09-03-2026 | FOR HEARING | |
| 16-02-2026 | For production of accused | |
| 16-01-2026 | Call on |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court dismissed the accused's petition for discharge under Section 300 Cr.P.C. (double jeopardy protection). Though the accused was previously acquitted by the High Court in 2021 due to defective investigation, the court found that the subsequent re-investigation by a superior officer rectified those shortcomings and charged the same accused afresh. The court held that the bar against double jeopardy does not apply when a retrial is ordered following an unfair initial investigation, as the exceptional circumstances justified the re-investigation and fresh prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court dismissed the accused's petition for discharge under Section 300 Cr.P.C. (double jeopardy protection). Though the accused was previously acquitted by the High Court in 2021 due to defective investigation, the court found that the subsequent re-investigation by a superior officer rectified those shortcomings and charged the same accused afresh. The court held that the bar against double jeopardy does not apply when a retrial is ordered following an unfair initial investigation, as the exceptional circumstances justified the re-investigation and fresh prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts