State of Kerala (Police) vs Sajan Varghese Advocate - JOHN JUDE ISSAC — 401403/2018
Case under Ipc \ Section 447,294(b),427. Disposed: Contested--AQUITTED on 11th March 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLAL130035862018
Filing Number
403571/2018
Filing Date
28-07-2018
Registration No
401403/2018
Registration Date
28-07-2018
Court
JFCM II, Cherthala
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Cherthala
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--AQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
812
Police Station
Aroor Police Station
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala (Police)
Adv. Asst. Public Prosecutor II, Cherthala
Respondent(s)
Sajan Varghese Advocate - JOHN JUDE ISSAC
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Cherthala
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 20-02-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 12-02-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 29-01-2026 | FOR HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Judicial First Class Magistrate court in Cherthala acquitted Sajan Varghese of charges under IPC sections 447 (criminal trespass), 294(b) (obscene language), and 427 (mischief) due to insufficient evidence. The court found the prosecution witnesses were interested parties whose testimonies lacked consistency, no documentary proof of property ownership or alleged losses was produced, and the case failed to meet the "beyond reasonable doubt" standard required for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Judicial First Class Magistrate court in Cherthala acquitted Sajan Varghese of charges under IPC sections 447 (criminal trespass), 294(b) (obscene language), and 427 (mischief) due to insufficient evidence. The court found the prosecution witnesses were interested parties whose testimonies lacked consistency, no documentary proof of property ownership or alleged losses was produced, and the case failed to meet the "beyond reasonable doubt" standard required for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts