State of Kerala (Police) vs NISHMA NOUSHAD Advocate - DEEPTH DINAKAR — 401191/2020
Case under Ipc \ Section 279,338,304(A). Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED on 18th March 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLAL130029362020
Filing Number
402936/2020
Filing Date
09-10-2020
Registration No
401191/2020
Registration Date
09-10-2020
Court
JFCM II, Cherthala
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Cherthala
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--AQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
799
Police Station
Aroor Police Station
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala (Police)
Adv. Asst. Public Prosecutor II, Cherthala
Respondent(s)
NISHMA NOUSHAD Advocate - DEEPTH DINAKAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Cherthala
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
for evidence.
Appearance Of Parties
for evidence.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 12-02-2026 | for evidence. |
| 15-01-2026 | Appearance Of Parties |
| 16-12-2025 | for evidence. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Cherthala acquitted Nishma Nousad of charges under IPC Sections 279, 338, and 304A (rash driving, voluntarily causing hurt, and causing death by negligence) in a 2020 scooter accident case. The court found that key prosecution witnesses turned hostile and documentary evidence alone could not establish the accused's identity as the vehicle rider or prove rash driving, necessitating acquittal under CrPC Section 255(1) due to insufficient credible oral testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Cherthala acquitted Nishma Nousad of charges under IPC Sections 279, 338, and 304A (rash driving, voluntarily causing hurt, and causing death by negligence) in a 2020 scooter accident case. The court found that key prosecution witnesses turned hostile and documentary evidence alone could not establish the accused's identity as the vehicle rider or prove rash driving, necessitating acquittal under CrPC Section 255(1) due to insufficient credible oral testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts