State of Kerala (Police) vs ANIL KUMAR Advocate - RAJAN. V.S — 400499/2022
Case under Ipc \ Section 447,323,324,34. Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED on 18th March 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLAL130014962022
Filing Number
401494/2022
Filing Date
30-06-2022
Registration No
400499/2022
Registration Date
30-06-2022
Court
JFCM II, Cherthala
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Cherthala
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--AQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
162
Police Station
Poochakkal Police Station
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala (Police)
Adv. Asst. Public Prosecutor II, Cherthala
Respondent(s)
ANIL KUMAR Advocate - RAJAN. V.S
RADHA KRISHNAN
Adv. RAJAN. V.S
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Cherthala
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
Appearance of Accused
for evidence.
for evidence.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 16-12-2025 | Appearance of Accused |
| 07-11-2025 | for evidence. |
| 18-09-2025 | for evidence. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Cherthala acquitted both accused (Anilkumar and Radhakrishnan) of charges under IPC sections 447, 323, 324, and 34 for allegedly trespassing and assaulting the complainant on March 7, 2022. The prosecution's case collapsed as key prosecution witnesses turned hostile, the injured witness could not be produced despite multiple opportunities, and no corroborating evidence was available, making it impossible to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The accused were discharged under section 248(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code and released from bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Cherthala acquitted both accused (Anilkumar and Radhakrishnan) of charges under IPC sections 447, 323, 324, and 34 for allegedly trespassing and assaulting the complainant on March 7, 2022. The prosecution's case collapsed as key prosecution witnesses turned hostile, the injured witness could not be produced despite multiple opportunities, and no corroborating evidence was available, making it impossible to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The accused were discharged under section 248(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code and released from bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts