state of kerala vs murali Advocate - JOHN JUDE ISSAC — 300114/2016

Case under Ipc \ Section 447,323,354(A). Disposed: Contested--AQUITTED on 26th March 2026.

CC - CALENDAR CASE

CNR: KLAL120013642016

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

3030061/2016

Filing Date

27-01-2016

Registration No

300114/2016

Registration Date

29-04-2016

Court

JFCM I Cherthala

Judge

1-Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Cherthala

Decision Date

26th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--AQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

1325

Police Station

Kuthiathodu Police Station

Year

2015

Acts & Sections

IPC \ Section 447,323,354(A)
Crl.MP/4971/2025 Classification : Absent Petition Section muralistate of kerala
Crl.MP/5012/2025 Classification : Absent Petition Section murali
Crl.MP/1/2026 Classification : Advance Application Section muralistate of kerala
Crl.MP/2/2026 Classification : Bail Application Section muralistate of kerala
Crl.MP/3/2026 Classification : Warrant Recall Petition Section muralistate of kerala

Petitioner(s)

state of kerala

Respondent(s)

murali Advocate - JOHN JUDE ISSAC

Midhun

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Cherthala

26-03-2026

Disposed

25-03-2026

Order/ Judgement

18-03-2026

Order/ Judgement

13-03-2026

FOR HEARING

11-03-2026

Order/ Judgement

Final Orders / Judgements

26-03-2026
Judgement

The court acquitted both accused (Murali and Midhun) of charges under IPC sections 447 (criminal trespass), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), and 354 (outraging modesty) due to material contradictions in witness testimonies, hostile witnesses, weak medical evidence, and lack of independent corroboration. The prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, particularly regarding the accused's intent and the specific details of the alleged assault. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted both accused (Murali and Midhun) of charges under IPC sections 447 (criminal trespass), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), and 354 (outraging modesty) due to material contradictions in witness testimonies, hostile witnesses, weak medical evidence, and lack of independent corroboration. The prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, particularly regarding the accused's intent and the specific details of the alleged assault. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

JFCM I Cherthala All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case