Reghuvaran vs Baby Sudharsanan — 200657/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Pre trial steps. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

Pre trial steps Next hearing 11-Jun-2026

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLAL110015662023

e-Filing Number

01-12-2023

Filing Number

201790/2023

Filing Date

01-Dec-2023

Registration No

200657/2023

Registration Date

01-Dec-2023

Court

Munsiff Court, Cherthala

Judge

1-Principal Munsiff. Cherthala

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26
Ia/3/2025 Classification : Section Baby Sudharsanan

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Reghuvaran

    Adv. HARIKUMAR G

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Baby Sudharsanan

Case History

  1. 11-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    Pre trial steps

    Principal Munsiff. Cherthala

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: The Principal Munsiff Court in Cherthala allowed the interim injunction petition filed by plaintiff Reghuvaran against defendant Baby Sudarsanan. The court restrained the defendant and anyone claiming under him from trespassing onto the disputed property or altering its nature until final disposal of the suit. Although the court acknowledged that the core dispute regarding property identity and title requires full trial adjudication, it found that preserving the property's existing condition serves the balance of convenience, as allowing construction during litigation could irreparably complicate final judgment. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Payment of balance court fee.

    Principal Munsiff. Cherthala

  5. 19-Feb-2026

    Order In IA

    Principal Munsiff. Cherthala

  6. 30-Jan-2026

    Order In IA

    Principal Munsiff. Cherthala

  7. 16-Jan-2026

    Order In IA

    Principal Munsiff. Cherthala

  8. 15-Dec-2025

    For Payment

    Principal Munsiff. Cherthala

  9. 17-Oct-2025

    For hearing on IA

    Principal Munsiff. Cherthala

  10. 24-Sep-2025

    For hearing on IA

    Principal Munsiff. Cherthala

  11. 21-Aug-2025

    For hearing on IA

    Principal Munsiff. Cherthala

  12. 01-Aug-2025

    For Objection and hearing

    Principal Munsiff. Cherthala

  13. 28-May-2025

    Pre trial steps

    Principal Munsiff. Cherthala

  14. 20-Mar-2025

    Appearance Of Parties

    Principal Munsiff. Cherthala

  15. 17-Mar-2025

    Appearance Of Parties

    Principal Munsiff. Cherthala

  16. 25-Feb-2025

    Appearance Of Parties

    Principal Munsiff. Cherthala

  17. 31-Jan-2025

    Issues

    Principal Munsiff. Cherthala

  18. 29-Jan-2025

    Issues

    Principal Munsiff. Cherthala

  19. 19-Dec-2024

    Issues

    Principal Munsiff. Cherthala

  20. 25-Nov-2024

    Issues

    Principal Munsiff. Cherthala

  21. 06-Nov-2024

    Issues

    Principal Munsiff. Cherthala

  22. 30-Sep-2024

    Issues

    Principal Munsiff. Cherthala

  23. 03-Sep-2024

    Issues

    Principal Munsiff. Cherthala

  24. 06-Aug-2024

    Issues

    Principal Munsiff. Cherthala

  25. 06-Jul-2024

    Issues

    Principal Munsiff. Cherthala

  26. 21-May-2024

    Issues

    Principal Munsiff. Cherthala

  27. 22-Feb-2024

    Written Statement

    Principal Munsiff. Cherthala

  28. 22-Jan-2024

    Return of summons

    Principal Munsiff. Cherthala

  29. 01-Dec-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 01-Dec-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 200657/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Principal Munsiff Court in Cherthala allowed the interim injunction petition filed by plaintiff Reghuvaran against defendant Baby Sudarsanan. The court restrained the defendant and anyone claiming under him from trespassing onto the disputed property or altering its nature until final disposal of the suit. Although the court acknowledged that the core dispute regarding property identity and title requires full trial adjudication, it found that preserving the property's existing condition serves the balance of convenience, as allowing construction during litigation could irreparably complicate final judgment. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case