N Ashokakumar vs Union Government of India Advocate - Radhakrishnan. G(Public Prosecutor) — 200710/2024
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 26. Status: For commission report. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLAL110014552024
Next Hearing
23rd June 2026
e-Filing Number
28-11-2024
Filing Number
201653/2024
Filing Date
29-11-2024
Registration No
200710/2024
Registration Date
29-11-2024
Court
Munsiff Court, Cherthala
Judge
2-Additional Munsiff, Cherthala
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
N Ashokakumar
Adv. RAMANATHAN T R, RAMANATHAN T R
Respondent(s)
Union Government of India Advocate - Radhakrishnan. G(Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Additional Munsiff, Cherthala
For commission report
Adjourned
For commission report
Appearance Of Parties
Written Statement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | For commission report |
| 05-02-2026 | Adjourned |
| 19-12-2025 | For commission report |
| 05-12-2025 | Appearance Of Parties |
| 04-12-2025 | Written Statement |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 200710/2024 The Additional Munsiff Court at Cherthala allowed petitioner N. Asokakumar's application for appointment of a commissioner to conduct local investigation in a boundary fixation and injunction suit against government entities. Advocate R. Renjith was appointed as Commissioner (Rs. 3,500 batta) and surveyor V.S. Ajithkumar (Rs. 2,500 batta) to measure the disputed properties and ascertain matters in the commission application. The Commissioner must provide notice to parties before inspection and ensure the survey plan meets High Court standards as per Sabu v. Sasi precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 200710/2024 The Additional Munsiff Court at Cherthala allowed petitioner N. Asokakumar's application for appointment of a commissioner to conduct local investigation in a boundary fixation and injunction suit against government entities. Advocate R. Renjith was appointed as Commissioner (Rs. 3,500 batta) and surveyor V.S. Ajithkumar (Rs. 2,500 batta) to measure the disputed properties and ascertain matters in the commission application. The Commissioner must provide notice to parties before inspection and ensure the survey plan meets High Court standards as per Sabu v. Sasi precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts