Abin Munch vs Indira Jayasimhan Advocate - SUBHANGAN. V. N, SUBHANGAN. V. N — 200696/2024
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section Section26Order7Rule1. Status: For Objection and hearing. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLAL110014212024
e-Filing Number
22-11-2024
Filing Number
201614/2024
Filing Date
23-Nov-2024
Registration No
200696/2024
Registration Date
23-Nov-2024
Court
Munsiff Court, Cherthala
Judge
2-Additional Munsiff, Cherthala
Last updated 12-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Abin Munch
Adv. THOMAS JOSEPH
-
2.M N Nambiar
Adv. THOMAS JOSEPH
-
3.Manju
Adv. THOMAS JOSEPH
Respondent(s)
-
1.Indira Jayasimhan Advocate - SUBHANGAN. V. N, SUBHANGAN. V. N
Case History
-
16-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Mar-2026
For Objection and hearing
Additional Munsiff, Cherthala
-
12-Mar-2026
For Objection and hearing
Additional Munsiff, Cherthala
-
11-Mar-2026
For Objection and hearing
Additional Munsiff, Cherthala
-
24-Jan-2026
For Objection and hearing
Additional Munsiff, Cherthala
-
29-Nov-2025
For Objection and hearing
Additional Munsiff, Cherthala
-
18-Oct-2025
For return of summons
Additional Munsiff, Cherthala
-
26-Aug-2025
Return of summons
Additional Munsiff, Cherthala
-
19-Jun-2025
Return of summons
Additional Munsiff, Cherthala
-
22-Mar-2025
Return of summons
Additional Munsiff, Cherthala
-
04-Jan-2025
Return of summons
Additional Munsiff, Cherthala
-
23-Nov-2024
OrderView PDF
-
23-Nov-2024
OrderView PDF
Summary: The Court granted an ex-parte interim injunction restraining the defendants from trespassing into the plaintiff's property and committing any act of waste for two weeks. The court found a prima facie case and issued notice to the respondents with a return date of 06.12.2024, requiring compliance with Order 39 Rule 3 provisos. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Nov-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Nov-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 200696/2024
Summary: The Court granted an ex-parte interim injunction restraining the defendants from trespassing into the plaintiff's property and committing any act of waste for two weeks. The court found a prima facie case and issued notice to the respondents with a return date of 06.12.2024, requiring compliance with Order 39 Rule 3 provisos. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts