Alappuzha Ananatha Narayanapuram Thuravoor Thirumala Devasom, Alappuzha represented by its president S. Rajkumar aged 57 years, S/o Surendra Kamath vs Dileep Advocate - VINOD M M, VINOD M M — 628/2025

Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section Order VII Rule 1 read with Section 26 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLAL110013142025

Written Statement

Next Hearing

10th June 2026

Filing Number

1155/2025

Filing Date

11-12-2025

Registration No

628/2025

Registration Date

11-12-2025

Court

Munsiff Court, Cherthala

Judge

2-Additional Munsiff, Cherthala

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section Order VII Rule 1 read with Section 26 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
IA/1/2025 Classification : Injunction Application Section Alappuzha Ananatha Narayanapuram Thuravoor Thirumala Devasom, Alappuzha represented by its president S. Rajkumar aged 57 years, S/o Surendra KamathDileep
IA/2/2025 Classification : Commission Application Section Alappuzha Ananatha Narayanapuram Thuravoor Thirumala Devasom, Alappuzha represented by its president S. Rajkumar aged 57 years, S/o Surendra KamathDileep
IA/3/2025 Classification : Petition To Accept Photocopy Section Alappuzha Ananatha Narayanapuram Thuravoor Thirumala Devasom, Alappuzha represented by its president S. Rajkumar aged 57 years, S/o Surendra KamathDileep

Petitioner(s)

Alappuzha Ananatha Narayanapuram Thuravoor Thirumala Devasom, Alappuzha represented by its president S. Rajkumar aged 57 years, S/o Surendra Kamath

Adv. Jayasree D

Respondent(s)

Dileep Advocate - VINOD M M, VINOD M M

Salvin V.J.

Adv. KIRAN BRIGHT R

T. Aniyappan

Adv. VINOD M M,VINOD M M

Remanan

Adv. VINOD M M,VINOD M M

John Britto

Adv. VINOD M M,VINOD M M

Manesh

Adv. VINOD M M,VINOD M M

P.G. Raveendran

Adv. VINOD M M

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Additional Munsiff, Cherthala

12-03-2026

Written Statement

04-03-2026

Order/ Judgement

03-02-2026

Adjourned

29-01-2026

Order/ Judgement

11-12-2025

For return of summons

Interim Orders

12-03-2026
Order

Summary The Additional Munsiff Court, Cherthala dismissed the interim injunction petition filed by Thirumala Devasom seeking to restrain respondents from trespassing on canal properties and obstructing fishing operations. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish ownership or possession of the disputed 180-acre padasekharam and 40-acre canals, did not approach the court with clean hands by seeking relief over properties it admittedly does not own, and could not clearly identify the property boundaries for enforcement of injunction. The court also determined that the balance of convenience favored the respondents, as granting the injunction would cause greater harm to them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Munsiff Court, Cherthala dismissed the interim injunction petition filed by Thirumala Devasom seeking to restrain respondents from trespassing on canal properties and obstructing fishing operations. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish ownership or possession of the disputed 180-acre padasekharam and 40-acre canals, did not approach the court with clean hands by seeking relief over properties it admittedly does not own, and could not clearly identify the property boundaries for enforcement of injunction. The court also determined that the balance of convenience favored the respondents, as granting the injunction would cause greater harm to them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Munsiff Court, Cherthala All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case