Pratheep vs Vinod Advocate - HORMIS ABRAHAM, JAYAKRISHNAN. T — 200617/2024
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section Order7rule1. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLAL110012332024
e-Filing Number
18-10-2024
Filing Number
201404/2024
Filing Date
18-Oct-2024
Registration No
200617/2024
Registration Date
18-Oct-2024
Court
Munsiff Court, Cherthala
Judge
1-Principal Munsiff. Cherthala
Last updated 25-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Pratheep
Adv. NANDANAM RAJASREE
-
2.Chandrika
Adv. NANDANAM RAJASREE
Respondent(s)
-
1.Vinod Advocate - HORMIS ABRAHAM, JAYAKRISHNAN. T
Case History
-
12-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
12-Mar-2026
Issues
Principal Munsiff. Cherthala
-
11-Feb-2026
Issues
Principal Munsiff. Cherthala
-
11-Dec-2025
Issues
Principal Munsiff. Cherthala
-
21-Oct-2025
Issues
Principal Munsiff. Cherthala
-
15-Sep-2025
Issues
Principal Munsiff. Cherthala
-
29-Jul-2025
Issues
Principal Munsiff. Cherthala
-
04-Jul-2025
Written Statement
Principal Munsiff. Cherthala
-
01-Apr-2025
Written Statement
Principal Munsiff. Cherthala
-
25-Jan-2025
Written Statement
Principal Munsiff. Cherthala
-
19-Nov-2024
Written Statement
Principal Munsiff. Cherthala
-
01-Nov-2024
Interim OrderView PDF
Summary: In IA 01/2024 before the Principal Munsiff, Cherthala, heard on 01.11.2024, the court extended the interim order till disposal of the Interim Application. The petitioners/plaintiffs (Pradeep and Chandrika) were represented, while the respondent/defendant (Vinod) was absent, and no objection was filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Oct-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Oct-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 200617/2024
Summary: In IA 01/2024 before the Principal Munsiff, Cherthala, heard on 01.11.2024, the court extended the interim order till disposal of the Interim Application. The petitioners/plaintiffs (Pradeep and Chandrika) were represented, while the respondent/defendant (Vinod) was absent, and no objection was filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts