Prabhakaran vs Dinesh.P Advocate - JOJI. K ANTONY — 200482/2024
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section Order 7 rule 1,section 26. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLAL110009252024
Next Hearing
02nd July 2026
e-Filing Number
25-07-2024
Filing Number
201038/2024
Filing Date
25-07-2024
Registration No
200482/2024
Registration Date
25-07-2024
Court
Munsiff Court, Cherthala
Judge
2-Additional Munsiff, Cherthala
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Prabhakaran
Adv. SUBHANGAN V. N
Respondent(s)
Dinesh.P Advocate - JOJI. K ANTONY
Deepa Dinesh
Adv. MANOJ. P
Lekshmi Dinesh
Adv. MANOJ. P
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Additional Munsiff, Cherthala
Issues
Order/ Judgement
Order/ Judgement
Order/ Judgement
Order/ Judgement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-05-2026 | Issues |
| 10-04-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 16-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 28-02-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 20-02-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 200482/2024 Dinesh.P (1st Defendant) filed an Interim Application to condone a 40-day delay in filing a review petition (IA 4/25). The Additional Munsiff dismissed the petition, finding that the petitioner failed to provide any reason or sufficient cause for the delay as required under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The court held the petition meritless and dismissed the IA. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 200482/2024 Dinesh.P (1st Defendant) filed an Interim Application to condone a 40-day delay in filing a review petition (IA 4/25). The Additional Munsiff dismissed the petition, finding that the petitioner failed to provide any reason or sufficient cause for the delay as required under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The court held the petition meritless and dismissed the IA. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts