P KRISHNA PRASAD vs Bajaj Finance Ltd. represented by its Managing Director Advocate - Snehamol p, SARUN. K IDICULA — 200019/2025
Case under Building (lease and Rent Control)amendment Act, 1974 Section 11(2)(b). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 17th March 2026.
RCP - RENT CONTROL PETITION
CNR: KLAL110006642025
e-Filing Number
10-06-2025
Filing Number
759/2025
Filing Date
10-06-2025
Registration No
200019/2025
Registration Date
10-06-2025
Court
Munsiff Court, Cherthala
Judge
1-Principal Munsiff. Cherthala
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P KRISHNA PRASAD
Adv. GEETHA S NAIR
Respondent(s)
Bajaj Finance Ltd. represented by its Managing Director Advocate - Snehamol p, SARUN. K IDICULA
Manager
Adv. Snehamol p,SARUN. K IDICULA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal Munsiff. Cherthala
Disposed
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
Order In IA
For production of documents/Affidavit
Order In IA
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence |
| 27-02-2026 | Order In IA |
| 25-02-2026 | For production of documents/Affidavit |
| 20-02-2026 | Order In IA |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Rent Control Court, Cherthala dismissed the petition filed by P. Krishna Prasad against Bajaj Finance Ltd., holding that it lacked jurisdiction to decide the matter. The court found that the registered lease deed dated 20/02/2023 contained an arbitration clause (Condition No. 22) mandating that disputes between lessor and lessee be referred to arbitration by a sole arbitrator, thereby ousting the court's jurisdiction over the rent control petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Rent Control Court, Cherthala dismissed the petition filed by P. Krishna Prasad against Bajaj Finance Ltd., holding that it lacked jurisdiction to decide the matter. The court found that the registered lease deed dated 20/02/2023 contained an arbitration clause (Condition No. 22) mandating that disputes between lessor and lessee be referred to arbitration by a sole arbitrator, thereby ousting the court's jurisdiction over the rent control petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts