P KRISHNA PRASAD vs Bajaj Finance Ltd. represented by its Managing Director Advocate - Snehamol p, SARUN. K IDICULA — 200019/2025

Case under Building (Lease and Rent Control)amendment Act, 1974 Section 11(2)(b). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

RCP - RENT CONTROL PETITION

CNR: KLAL110006642025

e-Filing Number

10-06-2025

Filing Number

759/2025

Filing Date

10-Jun-2025

Registration No

200019/2025

Registration Date

10-Jun-2025

Court

Munsiff Court, Cherthala

Judge

1-Principal Munsiff. Cherthala

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Building (Lease and Rent Control)amendment Act, 1974 Section 11(2)(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P KRISHNA PRASAD

    Adv. GEETHA S NAIR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Bajaj Finance Ltd. represented by its Managing Director Advocate - Snehamol p, SARUN. K IDICULA

  2. 2.Manager

    Adv. Snehamol p,SARUN. K IDICULA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Rent Control Court, Cherthala dismissed the petition filed by P. Krishna Prasad against Bajaj Finance Ltd., holding that it lacked jurisdiction to decide the matter. The court found that the registered lease deed dated 20/02/2023 contained an arbitration clause (Condition No. 22) mandating that disputes between lessor and lessee be referred to arbitration by a sole arbitrator, thereby ousting the court's jurisdiction over the rent control petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Munsiff. Cherthala

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    Principal Munsiff. Cherthala

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Order In IA

    Principal Munsiff. Cherthala

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    For production of documents/Affidavit

    Principal Munsiff. Cherthala

  8. 20-Feb-2026

    Order In IA

    Principal Munsiff. Cherthala

  9. 10-Feb-2026

    For Objection and hearing

    Principal Munsiff. Cherthala

  10. 04-Feb-2026

    For Objection and hearing

    Principal Munsiff. Cherthala

  11. 23-Jan-2026

    For Objection and hearing

    Principal Munsiff. Cherthala

  12. 16-Jan-2026

    Call on

    Principal Munsiff. Cherthala

  13. 14-Jan-2026

    For Hearing

    Principal Munsiff. Cherthala

  14. 05-Jan-2026

    For Objection and hearing

    Principal Munsiff. Cherthala

  15. 12-Dec-2025

    Listed to

    Principal Munsiff. Cherthala

  16. 02-Dec-2025

    For Hearing

    Principal Munsiff. Cherthala

  17. 03-Nov-2025

    Objection

    Principal Munsiff. Cherthala

  18. 06-Oct-2025

    Objection

    Principal Munsiff. Cherthala

  19. 11-Sep-2025

    Objection

    Principal Munsiff. Cherthala

  20. 16-Aug-2025

    Objection

    Principal Munsiff. Cherthala

  21. 08-Jul-2025

    Objection

    Principal Munsiff. Cherthala

  22. 11-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 10-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 200019/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Rent Control Court, Cherthala dismissed the petition filed by P. Krishna Prasad against Bajaj Finance Ltd., holding that it lacked jurisdiction to decide the matter. The court found that the registered lease deed dated 20/02/2023 contained an arbitration clause (Condition No. 22) mandating that disputes between lessor and lessee be referred to arbitration by a sole arbitrator, thereby ousting the court's jurisdiction over the rent control petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case