Retnamma vs Jayaram Advocate - BEJOY. K. V — 200367/2020
Case under Suit for Declaration \ Section O7,R1,S26. Status: Listed to. Next hearing: 23rd May 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLAL110006532020
Next Hearing
23rd May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
200754/2020
Filing Date
10-08-2020
Registration No
200367/2020
Registration Date
10-08-2020
Court
Munsiff Court, Cherthala
Judge
1-Principal Munsiff. Cherthala
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Retnamma
Adv. SANTHOSH. A. S
Respondent(s)
Jayaram Advocate - BEJOY. K. V
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal Munsiff. Cherthala
Listed to
For Defendent Evidence
Further evidence
Further evidence
for evidence.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Listed to | |
| 28-03-2026 | For Defendent Evidence | |
| 25-03-2026 | Further evidence | |
| 18-03-2026 | Further evidence | |
| 17-03-2026 | for evidence. |
Interim Orders
Case Summary The suit was allowed and decreed in favor of the plaintiff. The court set aside Sale Deed No. 1352/2019 executed in the defendant's favor, finding it vitiated by fraud and undue influence. The defendant was ordered to vacate the property within one month or face eviction through court process. A permanent prohibitory injunction was also imposed restraining the defendant from entering the property, and the plaintiff was awarded costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The suit was allowed and decreed in favor of the plaintiff. The court set aside Sale Deed No. 1352/2019 executed in the defendant's favor, finding it vitiated by fraud and undue influence. The defendant was ordered to vacate the property within one month or face eviction through court process. A permanent prohibitory injunction was also imposed restraining the defendant from entering the property, and the plaintiff was awarded costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts