Sudarsanan K.G. vs Maliyekkal Kudumbayogam Trust Reg.No.IV/-P.51/06 represented by its Secretary Advocate - Jayakrishnan — 200291/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7,R1,S26. Status: Listed to. Next hearing: 18th May 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLAL110005392018
Next Hearing
18th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
200610/2018
Filing Date
13-06-2018
Registration No
200291/2018
Registration Date
13-06-2018
Court
Munsiff Court, Cherthala
Judge
1-Principal Munsiff. Cherthala
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sudarsanan K.G.
Adv. SUBHANGAN. V. N
Respondent(s)
Maliyekkal Kudumbayogam Trust Reg.No.IV/-P.51/06 represented by its Secretary Advocate - Jayakrishnan
Maliyekkal Kudumbayogam Trust Reg.No.IV/-P.51/06 represented by its President
Adv. Jayakrishnan
Sasikumar
Adv. Jayakrishnan
Harshakumar K.B.
Addl.5. Rugminiyamma
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal Munsiff. Cherthala
Listed to
Further evidence
For production of documents/Affidavit
For production of documents/Affidavit
For production of documents/Affidavit
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Listed to | |
| 06-04-2026 | Further evidence | |
| 30-03-2026 | For production of documents/Affidavit | |
| 26-03-2026 | For production of documents/Affidavit | |
| 23-03-2026 | For production of documents/Affidavit |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Cherthala disposed of the Interlocutory Application by directing the defendants to obtain a surveyor's date and cooperate with the court-appointed commissioner to measure their property based on the re-survey plan, rather than the Litho Plan (which is merely a geological map lacking necessary survey measurements). The application was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Cherthala disposed of the Interlocutory Application by directing the defendants to obtain a surveyor's date and cooperate with the court-appointed commissioner to measure their property based on the re-survey plan, rather than the Litho Plan (which is merely a geological map lacking necessary survey measurements). The application was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts