Muhammed V A vs Hidayathul Islam Samajam Represented by its President Advocate - RATHEESH. N — 200132/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: For Mediation Report. Next hearing: 26th May 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLAL110002932025
Next Hearing
26th May 2026
e-Filing Number
05-03-2025
Filing Number
344/2025
Filing Date
04-03-2025
Registration No
200132/2025
Registration Date
04-03-2025
Court
Munsiff Court, Cherthala
Judge
2-Additional Munsiff, Cherthala
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Muhammed V A
Adv. AMBILI. P MADHAVAN
Respondent(s)
Hidayathul Islam Samajam Represented by its President Advocate - RATHEESH. N
Abdul Jaleel
Adv. RATHEESH. N
Junaid
Adv. RATHEESH. N
Rasakh
Adv. RATHEESH. N
Majeed K M
Adv. RATHEESH. N
Easa
Adv. RATHEESH. N
Dr Ansari Backer
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Additional Munsiff, Cherthala
For Mediation Report
Appearance Of Parties
Appearance Of Parties
Adjourned
Written Statement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 26-03-2026 | For Mediation Report |
| 12-03-2026 | Appearance Of Parties |
| 14-01-2026 | Appearance Of Parties |
| 14-11-2025 | Adjourned |
| 24-09-2025 | Written Statement |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Petition Dismissed. The Additional Munsiff's Court dismissed the plaintiff's petition seeking to restrain his expulsion from the executive committee of the Hidayathul Islam Samajam. The court found that the plaintiff had already been removed from his position as secretary on 22.02.2025 by committee resolution, which he himself signed, and established no prima facie case or legal right to remain on the committee. The court further held that without defined bylaws or statutory provisions, a general body meeting was not a mandatory requirement for his removal, and the balance of convenience favored the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Petition Dismissed. The Additional Munsiff's Court dismissed the plaintiff's petition seeking to restrain his expulsion from the executive committee of the Hidayathul Islam Samajam. The court found that the plaintiff had already been removed from his position as secretary on 22.02.2025 by committee resolution, which he himself signed, and established no prima facie case or legal right to remain on the committee. The court further held that without defined bylaws or statutory provisions, a general body meeting was not a mandatory requirement for his removal, and the balance of convenience favored the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts