Dineshan vs Sarasan Advocate - JOY VARGHESE — 41/2026

CASE SUMMARY The petition for temporary injunction filed by Dineshan seeking to restrain defendant Sarasan from obstructing a public pathway (B schedule property) providing access to his property has been dismissed with costs to the defendant. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case, as an alternative access route to the MLA road exists, thereby weakening his claim that the disputed pathway is the sole means of access to his property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.