P K Anilkumar vs Raveendran Advocate - SATHJITH. S. S — 100054/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order41,Rule1,Section96. Status: FOR HEARING. Next hearing: 18th May 2026.

AS - CIVIL APPEAL

CNR: KLAL100002632024

FOR HEARING

Next Hearing

18th May 2026

e-Filing Number

30-06-2024

Filing Number

100193/2024

Filing Date

01-07-2024

Registration No

100054/2024

Registration Date

01-07-2024

Court

Sub Court, Cherthala

Judge

1-Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code Section Order41,Rule1,Section96

Petitioner(s)

P K Anilkumar

Adv. JACOB TOMLIN VARGHESE

Respondent(s)

Raveendran Advocate - SATHJITH. S. S

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala

09-03-2026

FOR HEARING

06-02-2026

FOR HEARING

07-01-2026

FOR HEARING

26-11-2025

FOR HEARING

21-10-2025

FOR HEARING

Interim Orders

07-12-2024
Order
07-12-2024
Order
03-06-2025
Order

Summary: The Sub Judge Court at Cherthala dismissed the Interim Application (IA 5/2025) filed by P.K. Anilkumar without costs. The petitioner sought removal of obstructions on a right of way to his property, but the court found that the existence and user of the way through the respondent's property remain disputed matters. Since a court-commissioned inspection revealed only a 5-year-old foundation extension (not total obstruction), the court deemed it improper to order removal of the foundation before final disposal of the main case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Sub Judge Court at Cherthala dismissed the Interim Application (IA 5/2025) filed by P.K. Anilkumar without costs. The petitioner sought removal of obstructions on a right of way to his property, but the court found that the existence and user of the way through the respondent's property remain disputed matters. Since a court-commissioned inspection revealed only a 5-year-old foundation extension (not total obstruction), the court deemed it improper to order removal of the foundation before final disposal of the main case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Cherthala All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case